Forms & Surveys

Formbricks

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Formbricks GmbH · formbricks.com

An AI-assisted analysis of public evidence — not a hands-on test.

Every score, rationale and verdict on this page is AI-generated. Every claim cites the source it was read from. Nothing here is a human star review — and no score can be bought. How scores are made →

Method and versions

The Market Researcher v1.0 · The Operations Manager v1.0 · The HR Lead v1.0 · The Academic Researcher v1.0 · The Data Protection Officer v1.0 · The Skeptic v1.0 · rubric v1 · evaluated 29 Oct 2026

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

HTML

<a href="https://whats-best.ai/software/forms-and-surveys/formbricks"><img src="https://whats-best.ai/badge/forms-and-surveys/formbricks.svg" alt="Formbricks: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai" height="66"></a>

Markdown

[![Formbricks: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai](https://whats-best.ai/badge/forms-and-surveys/formbricks.svg)](https://whats-best.ai/software/forms-and-surveys/formbricks)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Formbricks at a glance

Vendor: Formbricks GmbH
Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Data hosting: Default not stated; pages mention Germany source, captured 28 Oct 2026
Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Panel verdict: The AI panel rates Formbricks 4/5, the mean of 6 judges. Formbricks is an open-source (AGPLv3) survey and experience-management platform from Formbricks GmbH of Kiel, offered as a cloud hosted in Germany or self-hosted on your own infrastructure. how scores are made
As of: Vendor pages captured 28 Oct 2026 to 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 29 Oct 2026. all sources

Formbricks alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Data Protection Officer

Weighted verdict

Signs off every form tool a department wants to use and has found health data in a feedback form before. Wants a data processing agreement and a subprocessor list on the vendor's own pages, consent fields and an anonymous mode that drops IP addresses, retention periods that delete on their own, EU hosting the customer can choose, and roles that keep responses away from people who do not need them.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Data Protection Officer

Panel median The Data Protection Officer This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.

Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion	Panel median	The Data Protection Officer
Form & survey building	4 of 5	4 of 5
Distribution, response collection & workflows	4 of 5	4 of 5
Survey analysis & reporting	3.5 of 5	3.5 of 5
Consent, GDPR & respondent data	3.5 of 5	4 of 5
Hosting choice, teams & portability	4 of 5	4.5 of 5
European sovereignty	3.5 of 5	4 of 5

Form & survey building

How this is scored

What can be built without code: question and field types, conditional logic and branching, piping and hidden fields, calculations, multi-page forms and progress, templates, design and branding, multiple languages, and accessible output for respondents.

0 — Not a form or survey builder; questions cannot be authored in the product.

3 — A builder with the common question types and a few templates; logic, branding or languages are basic or not described.

5 — A drag-and-drop builder with a wide range of question types, conditional logic that shows, hides or skips questions, multi-page forms, a template library, and the customer's logo, colours and fonts.

8 — Advanced logic with piping, hidden fields, calculations and scoring, randomisation, surveys translated into several languages from one master, reusable question libraries, custom CSS or themes, and accessible forms with a named standard (WCAG 2.1 AA or BITV) stated.

10 — Best-in-class authoring: complex research designs (loops, quotas in logic, conjoint or MaxDiff), versioned forms with change history, a published accessibility conformance report, and every element of a form available through the API.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Seventeen question types including a consent checkbox and multiple endings, branching with AND and OR rules and a fallback, recall and variables for piping and scoring, random answer order on single-select, and one master survey carrying every translation with right-to-left support is the advanced authoring level. Branding covers logo, colours, card styles and backgrounds, and an accessibility conformance report (VPAT) is stated as available. We found no public information on versioned forms with change history, and the conformance report is described as available rather than published against a named standard. 11 10 17

Report an error

Distribution, response collection & workflows

How this is scored

How forms reach people and what happens to an answer: share links, embedding, QR codes, email invitations with reminders, contact lists and panels, offline or kiosk collection, file uploads, payments and signatures inside the form, notifications, approval or assignment of submissions, and automations that pass a response on to other tools.

0 — No way to collect responses from other people; the product only analyses data collected elsewhere.

3 — A share link and an embed code, with responses visible in the product; invitations, notifications and onward workflows are basic or not described.

5 — Links, embedding and QR codes, email notifications on submission, file uploads, a few native integrations (spreadsheets, CRM, chat) plus a connector service such as Zapier or Make, and either email invitations with reminders or payments inside the form.

8 — Invitations to managed contact lists with reminders and unique links, response quotas and closing rules, offline or kiosk collection, submissions routed for approval or assignment, conditional notifications, documented webhooks and a REST API to read and write responses.

10 — Collection at research and process scale: panel or sample sourcing, multi-channel distribution (email, SMS, web, app intercept) with deduplication, workflows with branching and audit trail, and every response event exposed to the customer's systems in real time with a stated delivery guarantee.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Single-use links in batches of up to 5,000 using the customer's own IDs, scheduled open and close with a response-count stop, offline collection that syncs when the connection returns, and signed webhooks with retries plus a documented REST API for reading and writing responses cover the advanced collection level. Workflows route each completed response to the owning team with per-step run logs, and connectors run through Zapier, Make, n8n, native Google Sheets, Airtable, Notion and Slack. We found no public information on invitations to managed contact lists with reminders or SMS distribution. 11 12 13 17

Report an error

Survey analysis & reporting

How this is scored

What the product does with the answers: live results and charts, filters and segments, cross-tabulation, NPS, CSAT and other standard scores, open-text and sentiment analysis, shareable dashboards and reports, and exports to the formats analysts use (CSV, Excel, SPSS, R).

0 — No view of results inside the product; submissions can only be forwarded or downloaded one at a time.

3 — A table of responses with simple charts per question and a CSV export; filters, comparisons and report sharing are basic or not described.

5 — Charts per question, filters and segments, at least one comparison or cross-tab view, standard scores such as NPS, shareable or exportable reports (PDF, presentation), and exports to CSV and Excel.

8 — Cross-tabulation with significance testing, weighting, open-text coding or sentiment analysis, trend reports across survey waves, dashboards for different audiences with permissions, and SPSS or R exports with labels.

10 — A research-grade analysis environment: statistical models beyond cross-tabs (driver analysis, regression), benchmarks, text analytics with themes the customer can edit, and every analysis reproducible from documented exports or an analytics API.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Ready-made NPS, CSAT, CES, rating and sentiment measures are built in, grouping and filtering runs across question, source, country, language, sentiment and emotion, and dashboards can be shared read-only or read-write. Open-text answers get AI topic and sentiment tagging in any language, and the documented PostgreSQL data model with Power BI, Tableau, Superset, Snowflake and dbt access is a strong analysis path beyond the usual exports. We found no public information on significance testing, weighting or SPSS and R exports. 15 1 14 11

Report an error

Consent, GDPR & respondent data

How this is scored

What the product gives the customer to collect personal data lawfully: consent and privacy-notice fields, anonymous surveys that really drop IP addresses and identifiers, retention periods and automatic deletion, handling of access and erasure requests, encryption of responses, a data processing agreement, and controls over cookies and tracking on the form itself.

0 — The product collects no personal data from respondents, so there is nothing to protect; or it is a different kind of product.

3 — A privacy policy and a statement of GDPR compliance, with a checkbox field usable for consent; anonymity, retention and deletion are not described.

5 — A data processing agreement offered to customers, a consent or privacy-notice field, an anonymous mode that does not store IP addresses, responses deletable by the customer, and encryption in transit and at rest stated.

8 — Retention periods with automatic deletion, tools for access and erasure requests per respondent, field-level encryption or masking of sensitive answers, forms that set no tracking cookies by default, a published list of technical and organisational measures, and a named data protection officer.

10 — Data protection by design and evidenced: end-to-end or customer-key encryption of responses, documented data minimisation defaults, a DPA with audit rights and subprocessor change notice, records of consent kept with each response, and an independent audit of the privacy controls published.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

A public data processing agreement with audit rights, two weeks' written notice of sub-processor changes with an objection right, technical and organisational measures in an annex, and breach notification without undue delay is exactly the paperwork I require before sign-off. Anonymize mode stops storing country, IP address and device details with IP capture off unless switched on, opt-in consent is a checkbox that cannot be pre-checked, submissions can be deleted from the dashboard to honour erasure requests, and deleted data leaves the backups within 90 days. We found no public information on field-level encryption or masking, tracking-cookie defaults on the form itself, or a named data protection officer. 16 11 7 3 4

Report an error

Hosting choice, teams & portability

How this is scored

What the customer may choose about where and how the product runs and who uses it: a selectable data region or EU-only hosting, self-hosting or an on-premise edition, team workspaces with roles and permissions, single sign-on, an audit log, custom domains and white-labelling, and a complete export of forms and responses that another tool can import.

0 — A single-user tool with no export of forms or responses.

3 — Shared access for a team and a response export; data location, roles and single sign-on are not described.

5 — Hosting location stated with an EU option, team workspaces with at least two roles, single sign-on on a higher plan, a custom domain or removed vendor branding, and an export of all responses.

8 — EU-only hosting selectable per account or a self-hosted edition, granular roles per form or folder, SSO with SAML and user provisioning, an audit log, white-labelling, and forms and responses exportable in a documented format with an API.

10 — Full control over operation: an open-source or on-premise edition with feature parity, customer-chosen region per workspace, administrative APIs, a documented migration path in and out, and an uptime commitment with a published status history.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The self-hosted edition keeps responses, contacts and settings in the customer's own PostgreSQL, file uploads in their S3-compatible storage and mail through their own SMTP, with SAML or OIDC single sign-on, audit logs, and roles that separate read from write access to workflows, integrations and API keys scoped per workspace — and the vendor states no third-party access, not even itself. Responses export to CSV, Excel, direct SQL or the documented REST API against a published data model, with container images and a Helm chart making the way in and out realistic. We found no public information on user provisioning or a published uptime history, and the dedicated and managed cloud options are stated as coming. 17 13 1 15 11

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where forms and responses are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, email delivery, payment providers, analytics, AI features). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; responses often carry personal and sometimes special-category data, so the whole chain counts, not only the database.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.

5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (email, analytics, AI features, support) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Formbricks GmbH of Kiel is the contracting entity, cloud survey data is encrypted and stored in Germany, AI models and embeddings run in Germany on the vendor's own infrastructure, and the data processing agreement and sub-processor list are public, with Stripe Payments Europe Ltd. in Dublin named for payments and ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II stated. The captured privacy policy shows all listed server locations in Germany and the EU, but on AWS and Google Cloud with US-headquartered parents, and Stripe Inc. is separately named processing billing data in the USA, so a US Cloud Act exposure remains in the chain. We found no public information on the ownership structure, and the certificates are available on request rather than published with their scope, so the chain is European in entity and hosting but not end to end. 8 3 5 7 17 6

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per plan and per user, response or submission limits and what happens above them, which features (logic, branding removal, SSO, EU hosting, analysis modules) need a higher plan, add-ons, minimum term and the free tier's limits.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.

3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, responses or features is unclear.

5 — Plans are public with prices and their main limits (users, responses, forms), but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, EU hosting, extra responses, branding removal) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every plan priced publicly with its limits, overage or extra-response prices, feature differences per plan in a comparison table, billing period, VAT treatment and cancellation terms stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of users, responses and features, with every add-on, enterprise option, support level and data-return term published.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The structure is public — an annual license priced by responses per month and workspaces, unlimited seats, one- to three-year terms with longer terms costing less per year, overage responses billed separately, unused responses expiring, fees exclusive of taxes, and cancellation at any time with access to the end of the billing period — and a free plan and a free-forever Community Edition exist with a 15-day trial and no credit card. The paid prices themselves are not published: the vendor quotes after a first call. I cannot compute an annual cost for a given workload from the public pages alone. 2 9 10 11

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Legal entity	Not determined ⚠ unverified	—	uncited Report an error
Hosting location	Not determined ⚠ unverified	—	uncited Report an error
Hosting options	Not determined ⚠ unverified	—	uncited Report an error
Open source	Not determined ⚠ unverified	—	uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement	Not determined ⚠ unverified	—	uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error

Questions about Formbricks

Is Formbricks European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Formbricks as EU-Made.

Where does Formbricks store data?

The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Germany as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 28 Oct 2026.

Does Formbricks have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Formbricks?

As of 3 Nov 2026, the panel rates easyfeedback (3.5/5), Netigate (3.5/5) and QuestionPro (3.5/5) highest among the other 19 Forms & Surveys products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is easyfeedback (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Formbricks alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 28 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
Weak sourcing — Data processing agreement, Open source, Hosting location, Legal entity, Hosting options. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

13 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
10 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
5 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
3 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
5 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us

Do you know more about Formbricks? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (18)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

1 Vendor homepage formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
2 Pricing page formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
3 GDPR page formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
4 Security page formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
5 AI and privacy page formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
6 Privacy policy formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
7 Data processing agreement formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
8 Legal notice formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
9 Terms of service formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
10 Form & survey building — found from sitemap formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
11 Form & survey building — found from sitemap formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
12 Distribution, response collection & workflows — found from sitemap formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
13 Distribution, response collection & workflows — found from sitemap formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
14 Survey analysis & reporting — found from sitemap formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
15 Survey analysis & reporting — found from sitemap formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
16 Consent, GDPR & respondent data — found from sitemap formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
17 Hosting choice, teams & portability — found from sitemap formbricks.com Checked 28 Oct 2026 Details →
18 Code repository (open-source licence) — found from the homepage github.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →