whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers

Otter.ai

Rest of world Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Otter.ai, Inc. · otter.ai

Compare with Jamie → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Otter.ai: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Otter.ai: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Otter.ai at a glance

Vendor
Otter.ai, Inc.
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Outside the EU by default source, captured 5 Nov 2026
Free plan
Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 5 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Otter.ai 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Otter.ai is an AI meeting assistant from Otter.ai, Inc., a Delaware company based in Mountain View, California. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 5 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 6 Nov 2026. all sources

Otter.ai alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Sales Team Lead

Weighted verdict

Leads eight account executives at a software vendor for the German Mittelstand. Discovery calls run on Teams and Zoom, and the CRM is only as good as the notes someone found time to type. Does not want a coaching platform that scores the team: wants the call summary, next steps and the fields that matter written into HubSpot after every call, a follow-up email draft, and prospects told politely that the call is recorded.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Sales Team Lead

Panel median The Sales Team Lead This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Sales Team Lead
Recording, transcription & languages 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge 3 of 5 3.5 of 5
Integrations, API & workflow 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Consent, participant rights & works council 1.5 of 5 1.5 of 5
Retention, AI training & administration 2 of 5 2.5 of 5
European sovereignty 2 of 5 2 of 5
Pricing transparency 3 of 5 2.5 of 5

Recording, transcription & languages

How this is scored

How the conversation gets in and how faithfully it is written down: a bot that joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Webex, botless capture from a desktop or mobile app, in-person meetings and phone calls, file upload, live transcription, speaker identification and names, the languages supported with German stated, meetings that switch language, custom vocabulary for names and jargon, timestamps linked to the recording, and editing of the transcript.

0 — Does not record or transcribe meetings; a note template or agenda tool without capture.

3 — A bot that joins one or two conferencing tools and produces a transcript; languages, speaker names, in-person capture and accuracy are basic or not described.

5 — A bot for Zoom, Teams and Google Meet, a desktop or mobile app for in-person meetings, file upload, speaker identification, German among the supported languages, timestamps linked to the recording, and an editable transcript.

8 — Botless capture documented next to the bot, Webex and phone or dialer calls, live transcription, mixed-language meetings handled, custom vocabulary, speaker names learned across meetings, and the transcription engine or its accuracy per language stated.

10 — Capture a regulated team relies on: every channel above with accuracy published per language and method, dialects and specialist vocabulary documented, on-device or customer-hosted transcription as an option, and how errors are corrected and fed back stated.

Report an error

The Sales Team Lead

The bot covers Zoom, Teams and Google Meet, and the desktop and mobile apps record in-person meetings with no bot in the room; German is among six supported languages and the transcript is editable with speakers and time codes. Phone and dialer capture is there through Zoom Phone and RingCentral, but we found no public information on Webex, mixed-language meetings, or accuracy per language — the terms instead disclaim any warranty on transcription completeness or accuracy. A strong daily driver for my eight reps, just not the last word on accuracy. 2 3 5 6

Report an error

Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge

How this is scored

What the tool makes of the transcript: summaries and minutes by meeting type with editable templates, decisions and action items with owners and due dates, summaries in the meeting's language or a chosen one, follow-up emails, clips and highlights, search across all meetings, questions answered over the archive with citations back to the transcript passage, shared team folders or channels, and the minutes exported to Word, PDF or a wiki.

0 — No summaries of any kind; only the raw transcript or recording.

3 — One generic summary per meeting; templates, action items, search across meetings and citations are basic or not described.

5 — Summaries with templates per meeting type, action items and decisions extracted, the summary language selectable with German available, search across meetings, questions answered over one or several meetings, and sharing or export of the minutes.

8 — Custom templates per team, action items with owners pushed to task tools, answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on, topic or keyword tracking across meetings, team libraries with permissions, and the AI models used for summaries named.

10 — Meeting knowledge a company can audit: every generated statement traceable to its source passage, hallucination handling and human review documented, summary quality by language stated, and the archive queryable through an API or MCP server with the same permissions as in the app.

Report an error

The Sales Team Lead

Automated summaries, standard and advanced templates plus custom ones with per-plan limits, and follow-up automation that drafts the follow-up email and next steps — exactly what I want produced after every call. Action items go into Jira and Asana with deadlines, search runs across meetings with natural-language queries, there is an AI chat over the archive, an MCP server, and export to Word, PDF and more. We found no public information on answers citing the exact transcript passage they rest on. 2 3 4 5

Report an error

Integrations, API & workflow

How this is scored

How the notes reach the place where work happens: calendar connection with rules for which meetings are recorded, CRM fields filled from the call (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Microsoft Dynamics), project and task tools, Slack and Microsoft Teams channels, Notion, Confluence and SharePoint, Zapier, Make or n8n, a documented REST API and webhooks, an MCP server for AI assistants, and browser extensions and native apps.

0 — No integrations and no export; the notes stay in the app.

3 — A calendar connection and an email or Slack summary; CRM, API and task tools are basic or not described.

5 — Google and Microsoft calendars, a native CRM integration (HubSpot or Salesforce), Slack or Teams, a task or wiki tool, Zapier or Make, and a documented API or webhooks.

8 — CRM field mapping per meeting type, several CRMs including Microsoft Dynamics or Pipedrive, a full REST API with webhooks and reference documentation, an MCP server, SharePoint or Confluence export, and recording rules per calendar or meeting type.

10 — An integration layer a company builds on: every object reachable by API with rate limits and versioning stated, granular OAuth scopes, data residency kept across integrations, and the integrations administered centrally with logs.

Report an error

The Sales Team Lead

HubSpot, Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics and Zoho are all covered with transcripts and sales insights pushed to the CRM, calendars connect with auto-join, and Slack, Teams, Notion, SharePoint, Zapier and an API with webhooks are documented, with the MCP server named on the pricing page. We found no public information on per-meeting-type CRM field mapping or recording rules per calendar, or on the API's reference documentation. The HubSpot flow is the headline for my team; the rest is breadth I would only partly use. 2 3 5

Report an error

Retention, AI training & administration

How this is scored

What the employer can govern: retention periods and automatic deletion of recordings, transcripts and summaries, whether audio and video can be discarded after transcription, sharing defaults and link permissions, customer content excluded from model training by contract, the AI and transcription providers named with their region and their own retention, encryption, single sign-on (SAML), SCIM, roles and workspaces, admin policies on auto-recording and sharing, audit logs, export of the whole archive, and security certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2.

0 — No administration and no deletion; every user decides alone and recordings are kept indefinitely.

3 — Users can delete their own recordings and a security page exists; retention policies, model training, SSO and audit logs are basic or not described.

5 — Retention settings per workspace, customer content excluded from model training, team workspaces with roles, single sign-on, admin control over sharing and auto-recording, encryption at rest and in transit, and ISO 27001 or SOC 2 stated.

8 — Automatic deletion by policy with audio discardable after transcription, the AI and transcription subprocessors named with region and zero retention, SAML with SCIM, granular roles, audit logs, legal hold or export of the full archive, and certifications with their scope published.

10 — Governance an auditor accepts: every retention, sharing and recording policy enforceable centrally and logged, models run on the vendor's own or the customer's infrastructure as an option, audit logs exportable to a SIEM, and the deletion of every copy, including at subprocessors, documented.

Report an error

The Sales Team Lead

Admins get central policy, workspace and sharing controls, SSO and SCIM from a 100-user licence, audit logging and bulk export, and deleted content moves through a trash folder into permanent deletion. But the privacy policy states the service trains its own AI on de-identified recordings and transcripts, with an organizational opt-out only via the account manager, and we found no public information on configurable retention periods, discarding audio after transcription, or ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certification. 4 5 6 7

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where recordings, transcripts, summaries, voice profiles and account data are stored and processed, which language model and transcription providers read them and where, and who the other subprocessors are (hosting, email, support, analytics and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline. A conferencing platform outside Europe that the customer already uses is part of the meeting, not counted against the notetaker; where the notetaker stores and processes the conversation is.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.

5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (language models, transcription, email, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors including the AI providers listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, with transcription and language models run in Europe by European operators, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.

Report an error

The Sales Team Lead

The chain runs through the United States: the contracting entity is Otter.ai, Inc. of Mountain View, California, hosting sits with Amazon Web Services in the US, and every subprocessor on the published list — including Anthropic and OpenAI for AI functions, both listed with no storage and no training of customer data — is US-based. A GDPR data processing agreement and Standard Contractual Clauses are published and the vendor is certified under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, but we found no public information on any EU hosting option. For my German prospects that is a conversation to have before the rollout, not after. 6 7 8

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per seat and tier, what counts as a seat (every invited user, only recording users), transcription minutes or credits included, storage limits, which features (CRM integrations, API access, SSO, custom retention, EU hosting, AI credits) cost extra, the free tier and its limits, monthly versus annual billing, minimum seats and VAT.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.

3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with seats, minutes or features is unclear.

5 — Tiers are public with their seat price and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, CRM integration, API, custom retention, EU hosting, minute or credit limits) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (seats, minutes, credits, storage), add-ons priced, what counts as a seat stated, overage handling stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given team size and meeting volume, with every add-on, overage and support fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The Sales Team Lead

Per-seat prices are public — Basic free, Pro at $8.33 /user/month save 51%, Business at $19.99 /user/month save 33%, with monthly and annual billing — and the plan tables are unusually granular about minutes, import limits, concurrent meetings and AI chat queries. Enterprise is contact-sales only, the HIPAA add-on and live transcription via RTMP carry unpriced additional fees, VAT treatment is not stated, and the captured pages give different figures for the Business plan's monthly transcription minutes — 6,000 on one page, unlimited on another. I could roughly budget a nine-person team but not nail the annual invoice to the euro. 4 5 6

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

1 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Outside the EU ⚠ unverified 0/4 pts 8 Report an error
Hosting options Not determined — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about Otter.ai

Is Otter.ai European?

No. whats-best.ai classifies Otter.ai as Rest of world.

Where does Otter.ai store data?

Otter.ai stores customer data outside the EU by default, per the vendor’s page captured 5 Nov 2026.

Does Otter.ai have a free plan?

Yes. Otter.ai has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 5 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Otter.ai?

As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates MeetGeek (3.5/5), Noota (3.5/5) and Jamie (3.5/5) highest among the other 14 AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is MeetGeek (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Otter.ai alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Otter.ai? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (8)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage otter.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Features page otter.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Integrations page otter.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Features page (enterprise) otter.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Pricing page otter.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Terms of service otter.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Privacy policy otter.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Subprocessor list otter.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →