casavi vs facilioo

casavi

The captured pages present casavi as a communication and process platform — case management, apps, documents, communication, contractor steering and AI — and I found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung with the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, distribution keys, or heating-cost apportionment per HeizkostenV. Not a word on whether the Rücklage is segregated trust money rather than a labelled balance, and for me that is the whole criterion.

facilioo

The captured pages position the product as CRM software for property professionals and show meter, maintenance and consumption-data management, but I found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, on a Jahresabrechnung in the form the courts require with the Abrechnungsspitze shown separately, on distribution keys, or on the Rücklage being segregated as trust money. From my chair that gap sits close to the bottom of the scale; the consumption-data monitoring alone keeps it off the floor.

casavi

The marketed feature list and benefits say nothing about convening owners' meetings, agenda structure, notice periods, majority arithmetic or a Beschluss-Sammlung kept as a register. I found no public information on any meeting support, let alone the amendment and invalidation notes the law requires in the register.

facilioo

The meeting module genuinely runs meetings: invitations, agenda points with prepared resolutions displayed in the platform, real-time voting with immediate results, exact capture of Abstimmungsgruppen and Vollmachten, in Präsenz, hybrid or online formats, with minutes secured and protocols transferred into the system and the Kundenapp. I found no public information on quorum and majority arithmetic per resolution type or on a maintained, numbered Beschluss-Sammlung with amendment and invalidation notes, which is what would earn more.

casavi

A separate owner portal at mycasavi.com is referenced by the privacy policy, which states it is governed by its own policy, and apps are a listed module — so a portal exists. But the captured pages give no public information on per-owner scoping, own statements, meeting papers, or a defect form with visible status; everything an owner's right to inspect the records would rest on is undocumented.

facilioo

The Kundenapp puts documents, meeting protocols and damage reporting with photo upload in owners' hands, alongside active monitoring of consumption data and a realtime status overview with transparent communication. I found no public information on per-owner scoping of statements, strict separation of tenant and owner visibility, or an access log that would discharge the statutory disclosure duty.

casavi

Case management and contractor coordination are core marketed modules — Vorgangsmanagement, Vorgänge koordinieren, Dienstleistersteuerung — which supports a ticket list with contractors steered from the system. I found no public information on a recurring maintenance calendar, Gewährleistung periods tracked per trade, or statutory inspections with proof of completion stored.

facilioo

Defects are documented and worked in a structured way, with photos and Kostenvoranschläge synchronised to SchadenFUX24, insurance approvals visible directly in the system, and the entire damage history from first report to settlement retrievable at any time; a contractor-management module and meter, maintenance and elevator management appear in the module list. I found no public information on statutory inspections scheduled with stored proof of completion, warranty periods tracked against trades, or cost allocated against a business plan.

casavi

Dokumente is a named module and organising documents a stated benefit, so central storage per property is plausible. But I found no public information on version history, retention executed per statutory period inside the product, or a defined handover export a successor administrator could load — the retention periods quoted in the privacy policy concern the vendor's own records, not the community's.

facilioo

Digital document management exists in the Kundenapp, the privacy policy states statutory retention of 6 years under the HGB and 10 years under the AO, and a documented export path is visible on the developer pages — a file archive endpoint and a DocuWare export of master data. I found no public information on full-text search, version history, or a complete handover package a successor administrator could actually load, so the statutory exit event remains unproven.

casavi

The captured pages name casavi GmbH in Munich in the commercial register, host the website with AWS on servers inside the EU, publish a subprocessor list, and cover the non-EU processors among them (MailChimp in the USA, CloudAlly in Canada) with EU Standard Contractual Clauses. But those hosting statements speak of the website, and I found no public information on where platform customer data or the casavi AI processing reside — the portal mycasavi.com has its own privacy policy that was not captured.

facilioo

The contracting entity is facilioo GmbH, Kurfürstendamm 92, Berlin, with a Handelsregister entry at Charlottenburg, and the privacy policy names its subprocessors — US processors such as Google and LinkedIn alongside XING in Hamburg and Sendinblue in Paris — with transfers resting on Standardvertragsklauseln and the Privacy Shield in a policy dated 25.05.2018. I found no public information on where the platform's data is hosted or on the ownership structure, and the app has its own privacy policy whose contents are not shown here.

casavi

The captured pricing page says prices are as individual as the customers, assembled in a sales consultation, with an individual offer made from 4,000 managed units and all prices stated to exclude VAT — but no actual price figure is confirmed anywhere in the captured facts. An administrator therefore cannot compute the annual cost for the units under management from public pages; that is a sales conversation, not computable pricing.

facilioo

The pages advertise a trial marked "KOSTENFREI TESTEN", a free demo, and the SchadenFUX24 interface stated as free for property managers — but beyond those free items I found no public per-unit or per-community price, no billing period, and no setup, migration or module pricing. An administrator cannot compute the annual cost for the units under management from public pages alone; that is close to the floor of the scale.