casavi vs facilioo

casavi

Nothing in the captured material mentions a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung, distribution keys or the handling of the Rücklage — the vendor presents itself as a communication and process platform built around case management, documents, communication and AI. For the statutory financial year I found no public information at all, so the March settlement run is not something this evidence supports.

facilioo

The vendor presents itself as CRM software for property professionals, and I found no public information on a business plan, an annual settlement, distribution keys or separate trust handling of the reserve — the March settlement run would have to happen entirely outside this system. The only adjacent capability is active monitoring of consumption data, which is an input to a settlement, not a settlement.

casavi

The published feature list names case management, apps, documents, communication, contractor steering and AI, with no mention of convening an Eigentümerversammlung, recording attendance and proxies, or maintaining a Beschluss-Sammlung. We found no public information on invitations, agenda handling, voting or majority arithmetic of any kind.

facilioo

The meeting workflow itself is genuinely evidenced: sending invitations, building agendas, realtime voting with immediate results, minutes secured in the platform, precise capture of voting groups and proxies, and presence, hybrid or online modes. What I found no public information on is quorum and majority arithmetic per resolution type and a maintained resolution register with amendment and invalidation notes — the register the law makes me keep.

casavi

The privacy policy distinguishes a separate portal, mycasavi.com, and the feature list names apps and communication, so an owner-facing channel exists — but that same policy is expressly not written for that portal. We found no public information on per-owner scoping, owners' own statements and documents, meeting papers, or defect reporting with visible status.

facilioo

A customer app for iOS and Android is evidenced with document management, protocols delivered into the app, damage reporting with photo upload, a realtime status overview and consumption-data monitoring. I found no public information on per-owner statements, arrears per unit, a separately scoped tenant view, or an access log that would discharge the disclosure duty.

casavi

Case management and contractor steering are named features, with claims of 33 % faster processing of cases and 10 % more capacity per team member, which reads as ticket intake and contractor coordination inside the system. Beyond that we found no public information on recurring maintenance calendars, statutory inspections with proof of completion, or Gewährleistung periods tracked against a trade.

facilioo

Defect intake with photos, structured handling of defects, contractor control, and meter, maintenance and elevator management are named modules, and the SchadenFUX24 round trip is concrete — cost estimates synchronized, insurance approvals visible in the system, the whole damage history from first report to settlement viewable. The statutory side is thinner: I found no public information on warranty periods per trade, scheduled statutory inspections with stored proof of completion, or allocation of costs to the correct account.

casavi

Documents are a named feature and organizing documents appears among the benefits, which evidences central storage; the only retention periods anywhere are recited in the privacy policy for website data, citing six and ten years under HGB and AO. We found no public information on version history, retention executed as a product feature, or a defined handover export for a community changing administrator.

facilioo

Digital document management is claimed, the developer documentation shows a file archive endpoint plus DocuWare export of master data and document import, and the privacy policy states six-year and ten-year retention obligations. I found no public information on full-text search, version history, documents linked to the resolutions and settlements that reference them, or a handover package a successor administrator could actually load — and for me handover is a statutory event, not a support ticket.

casavi

The contracting entity is a German GmbH with a Munich commercial register entry, and the privacy policy names EU-region AWS hosting plus a detailed subprocessor list including US and Canadian providers under EU standard contractual clauses. But that policy is expressly not written for the mycasavi portal, so we found no public information on where the community's own records are hosted or which subprocessors touch the platform itself.

facilioo

The contracting entity is verifiably German — facilioo GmbH on Kurfürstendamm in Berlin, registered at the Charlottenburg court — and the privacy policy names its processors with legal bases and an Art. 28 processing-contract arrangement. But the named processors are website and marketing services, several of them US firms, with the 2018-dated policy citing Privacy Shield among its safeguards, and I found no public information on where the platform's community data is hosted or who owns the vendor.

casavi

The captured pricing statements say prices are "so individuell wie unsere Kunden" with the right package assembled in a sales consultation, that individual offers are made from 4,000 Verwaltungseinheiten upward, and "Alle Preise verstehen sich zzgl. Mehrwertsteuer" — but no per-unit or per-community figure appears anywhere. An administrator with forty communities cannot compute the annual cost from these pages, and we found no public information on module, setup, migration or minimum-term costs.

facilioo

No product price is published anywhere I can see — only a free demo, a free trial, and the statement that the SchadenFUX24 interface stands free of cost to Hausverwaltungen. I cannot compute an annual cost for forty communities from these pages, so every real quote is a sales conversation.