casavi vs facilioo

casavi

The captured pages sell casavi as a communication and process platform — case management, documents, communication, contractor steering, AI — and never show the statutory financial cycle. We found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung in the post-2021 form, distribution keys or the separate handling of the Rücklage.

facilioo

The captured pages position this as a CRM for property professionals with meter, maintenance and elevator modules plus active consumption monitoring, and we found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung in the form the BGH requires, distribution keys, or any separate handling of the Rücklage. Meter and consumption data are the raw material for an apportionment, not the apportionment itself.

casavi

The published feature list covers cases, apps, documents, communication, contractor steering and AI; a meeting function appears nowhere in it. We found no public information on agenda-driven invitations, voting support, majority arithmetic or a maintained Beschluss-Sammlung.

facilioo

The Eigentümerversammlung pages do show the meeting itself: sending invitations, building agendas, realtime voting, exact capture of Vollmachten and Abstimmungsgruppen, presence/hybrid/online modes, and protocols stored and pushed into the owner app. What I do not find is the arithmetic that decides whether a Beschluss stands — quorum or majority computed per resolution type — or a maintained Beschluss-Sammlung with amendment and invalidation notes; the evidence stops at securing Protokolle.

casavi

The privacy policy names a separate portal at mycasavi.com with its own data-protection terms, so an owner-facing portal exists — but that is the whole of it. We found no public information on per-owner login, personal statements, meeting papers or a defect form reaching the administrator.

facilioo

A Kundenapp exists with digital document management, protocols, photo-supported Schadensmeldung, structured Mängel documentation and consumption monitoring, which covers documents, meeting papers and a request path to the administrator. We found no public information on per-owner scoping, separate owner and tenant views, per-unit arrears, or defect status visible to the reporter — that is as far as the evidence takes it.

casavi

Case management and contractor steering are named features ("Vorgangsmanagement", "Dienstleistersteuerung", "Dienstleister koordinieren"), which puts contractor coordination inside the system rather than outside it. We found no public information on defect records with status and photos, recurring maintenance schedules, warranty periods or statutory inspections with proof of completion.

facilioo

Defects are documented with photos and structured processing, contractor control (Handwerkersteuerung) is a listed module, and Zähler-, Wartungs- und Aufzugsmanagement with automatic follow-ups covers recurring obligations. The SchadenFUX24 interface even syncs damage photos and cost estimates and keeps the entire claim history visible, but we found no public information on Gewährleistung periods tracked per trade, statutory inspections with stored proof of completion, or costs allocated to accounts.

casavi

A "Dokumente" module and the benefit "Dokumente organisieren" evidence central document storage; the privacy policy cites § 257 HGB and § 147 AO retention periods, but for the vendor's own website data, not as product retention for community records. We found no public information on versioning, full-text search or a defined handover export a successor administrator could load.

facilioo

Digital document management is claimed, and a public API offers a file-archive endpoint plus a DocuWare export of master data — the beginnings of an export path, but master data is not a community's records. We found no public information on full-text search, versioning, retention executed for community documents, or a defined handover package a successor administrator could actually load; the statutory retention periods quoted come from the website privacy policy, not a product feature.

casavi

The imprint shows a German contracting entity (casavi GmbH, AG München HRB 218832) and the privacy policy states EU hosting on AWS and names its subprocessors, including US and Canadian ones (MailChimp/Rocket Science Group, Intercom, CloudAlly) with EU standard contractual clauses as the mechanism. But that policy explicitly excludes the owner portal mycasavi.com, and we found no public information on where casavi AI processes community data.

facilioo

The contracting entity is solidly German — facilioo GmbH at Kurfürstendamm, Charlottenburg register, German VAT ID — with a named data protection officer. But we found no public information on where the platform hosts community data, and the platform's own privacy policy is not among the captured pages; the website policy, dated 25.05.2018, names US processors (Google, LinkedIn, PayPal) with safeguards citing Privacy Shield and standard contractual clauses.

casavi

The captured pricing page describes prices as individual per customer, individual offers from 4,000 units, and a note "Alle Preise verstehen uns zzgl. Mehrwertsteuer" — yet no per-unit or per-community figure appears anywhere. We found no public information on minimum terms, setup or migration fees, so an administrator cannot compute an annual cost from these pages.

facilioo

The only cost statements on the captured pages are a kostenlose Demo, a kostenfrei test offer, and the SchadenFUX24 interface at no charge for Hausverwaltungen. We found no public price for the software itself — no per-unit or per-community figure, billing period, minimum term, setup or migration cost — so an administrator cannot compute an annual invoice from public pages.