casavi vs facilioo

casavi

The captured pages present a communication and process platform — case management, apps, documents, communication, contractor steering, AI — and we found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung in the BGH form, distribution keys or separate reserve-fund accounting. For an administrator who has to put a settlement before the owners, these pages show no place where that arithmetic would live.

facilioo

I looked for anything on the Wirtschaftsplan, the Jahresabrechnung, distribution keys or the separate handling of the Rücklage and found no public information. The published module list reads as a CRM for property professionals — tasks, insurance claims, contractor and meter management — with nothing on the statutory financial cycle, so an owner wanting to retrace the settlement to individual postings has nothing to retrace.

casavi

We found no public information on convening or running an Eigentümerversammlung, on voting and majority arithmetic, or on a maintained Beschluss-Sammlung. The feature list names communication and apps, but nothing about invitations, minutes or a numbered resolution register.

facilioo

The meeting itself is clearly run in the platform: invitations, agendas, realtime voting, proxies and voting groups, in Präsenz, hybrid or online form, with 5,000 Versammlungen claimed and protocols handed to the customer app. What I found no public information on is the notice period being enforced, the majority arithmetic per resolution type, and — the part owners actually rely on later — a continuously maintained Beschluss-Sammlung as a numbered register with amendment and invalidation notes.

casavi

The privacy policy expressly excludes the portal mycasavi.com and apps appear in the feature list, so a separate owner-facing portal exists — more than nothing. But we found no public information on statements, meeting papers, per-owner or per-tenant scoping, or a defect form that reaches the administrator, so an owner's right to inspect records is not shown to be served here.

facilioo

There is a genuine customer app: documents, meeting protocols, active consumption monitoring, and defect reports with photo upload under a real-time status view, so routine reporting moves into the portal. But I found no public information on whether owners and tenants are scoped separately, on per-owner statements or arrears by unit, or on any access log that would let me check the records without asking the administrator.

casavi

Case management and contractor steering are named features, and the vendor claims 33 % faster processing of Vorgängen with AI, so intake and contractor coordination plausibly run inside the system. We found no public information on recurring maintenance schedules with reminders, photo documentation, warranty or Gewährleistung tracking, or statutory inspections with stored proof of completion.

facilioo

Defect intake with photos, structured processing of Mängel, contractor management and meter, maintenance and elevator management are all in the module list, and the SchadenFUX24 link carries each claim from first report to settlement with synced damage images and cost estimates and insurance approvals visible in the system — a proper trail on the insurance side. I found no public information on Gewährleistung periods tracked per trade or on statutory inspections scheduled with proof of completion stored.

casavi

Documents are a named feature and organising documents a stated benefit, which supports central storage for an administration. We found no public information on versioning, search, retention periods executed per community, or a defined handover export a successor administrator could actually load.

facilioo

Documents are managed digitally, a published developer API offers a per-file archive export together with a DocuWare master-data export, and retention obligations of six and ten years are stated in the privacy terms. That is not yet a handover: I found no public information on version history, full-text search, or a defined export package — ledger, register, documents, master data — that a successor administrator could actually load.

casavi

The contracting entity is casavi GmbH in Munich with a German commercial register entry, hosting is on AWS within the EU, and the privacy policy names its processors — including non-EU ones such as CloudAlly in Canada and MailChimp in the USA — under EU Standard Contractual Clauses as the stated safeguard.

facilioo

The contracting entity is plainly German — facilioo GmbH at Kurfürstendamm 92, Berlin, registered under HRB 163309 — and the website's processors are named. But we found no public information on where the platform's records are hosted, the privacy policy explicitly excludes the platform itself in favour of its own separate policy, and the transfers it does describe rest on the Privacy Shield in a text dated 2018 — so I cannot tell a neighbour where our settlement data actually sits.

casavi

The pricing page states prices are individual — packages drawn up in a sales consultation, with individual offers from 4.000 Verwaltungseinheiten upward — and that all prices are quoted plus VAT. No per-unit or per-community figure appears on the captured pages, so an administrator cannot compute the annual cost for the units under management from public information alone.

facilioo

Beyond a free trial, a free demo request, and a partner damage interface offered kostenfrei to property managers, we found no public prices at all — no per-unit figure, no module prices, no minimum term, no setup or migration costs. An administrator cannot compute the annual cost for the units under management from these pages; every quote is a sales conversation.