As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates Fathom AI Notetaker 2.5/5 and Leexi 3.5/5 in AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 0 of the 6 judges pick Fathom AI Notetaker and 6 pick Leexi. Fathom AI Notetaker scores higher on 1 of 7 criteria (Pricing transparency). Leexi scores higher on 6 of 7 criteria (European sovereignty, Recording, transcription & languages, Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge, plus 3 more). Provenance — Fathom AI Notetaker: Rest of world; Leexi: EU-Made. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.
Six judges lean Leexi on five criteria: capture and transcription (7.0 vs 4.3), summaries and knowledge (7.2 vs 5.0), integrations and workflow (8.0 vs 7.0), data control and administration (7.0 vs 5.8) and sovereignty (8.0 vs 3.0). The bench splits elsewhere: pricing transparency is the one criterion where Fathom is ahead, 5.8 to 5.5 — three judges lean Fathom, one Leexi, two tie. Consent and codetermination: three judges lean Leexi, three tie, means 4.2 vs 3.7. Leexi's verdict documents AWS Paris storage, an Azure France closed circuit alongside Mistral, and ten subprocessors with regions; Fathom's privacy policy states United States hosting by Fathom Video Inc., and its trust-page subprocessor listing was captured empty. Fathom's judges split 4 to 6 on summaries and knowledge, over German-language minutes versus credited action items. Per-judge weighted totals run 4.5 to 5.3 for Fathom, 6.4 to 6.8 for Leexi.
Choose Fathom AI Notetaker if
You decide primarily on published pricing tiers: the bench leans Fathom on pricing transparency, three judges to one with two ties, means 5.8 vs 5.5.
Your meetings and minutes run in English only: Fathom's documented summaries are English-only, and the 4 to 6 split among its judges on summaries and knowledge turned on German-language minutes.
Your compliance framework accepts United States hosting: Fathom's data residency is recorded as non-EU, and its privacy policy states the service is hosted in the United States by Fathom Video Inc.
Choose Leexi if
You need EU data residency: Leexi stores recordings on AWS in Paris with a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes and runs OpenAI via Azure France in a closed circuit alongside Mistral; six judges lean Leexi on sovereignty, 8.0 vs 3.0.
You must review a subprocessor list before purchase: Leexi lists ten subprocessors with regions, while Fathom's trust-page subprocessor listing was captured empty.
Transcription quality is decisive for you: capture and transcription stands at 7.0 vs 4.3, with six judges leaning Leexi.
Your stack spans many platforms: Leexi joins ten conferencing tools including Teams, Google Meet, Zoom and Webex and feeds eleven CRMs including Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive; six judges lean Leexi on integrations and workflow, 8.0 vs 7.0.
You rely on meeting summaries for knowledge capture: summaries and knowledge stands at 7.2 vs 5.0 with six judges leaning Leexi, and Fathom's documented summaries are English-only.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The Skeptic
Has seen "99% accuracy in 100 languages" turn a German meeting into English nonsense, a bot that joined a meeting its owner never attended and mailed the summary to every guest, and an action item no one in the room had agreed to. Asks which model wrote the summary and where it runs, whether each statement can be traced to the transcript, who told the external participants, what "we do not train on your data" covers in the DPA — and how the archive leaves.
Fathom AI Notetaker
Leexi
This judge's pick
Criterion by criterion
Recording, transcription & languages
Fathom AI Notetaker
A bot that joins Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams and even Slack Huddles, with a documented bot-free mode that keeps speaker attribution — but that mode is a Mac-only beta and the in-person iOS app is explicitly not live yet. Beyond the platforms, the capture story goes quiet: we found no public information on supported languages, German included or not, transcription accuracy, timestamps, custom vocabulary or transcript editing. Which engine writes the words down, and how well, is not stated anywhere we read.
Leexi
A bot documented for Meet, Teams, Zoom, Webex and more, VoIP calls from Aircall to Teams Phone, a mobile app for in-person meetings, live captioning, a company dictionary for jargon, and speech-to-text engines named as Gladia, ElevenLabs and Azure Speech. We found no public information on accuracy per language, mixed-language meetings, or editing the transcript, so I stop below the top level.
Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge
Fathom AI Notetaker
Summaries, decisions and action items assigned by name appear the moment a meeting ends, with search and Ask Fathom across team calls, a shared workspace and recap emails. But the developer documentation for the summary endpoint says it is "Always displayed in English", and we found no templates per meeting type, no named summarizing models, and no answers that cite the transcript passage they rest on. For a German-speaking team I cannot confirm the minutes would arrive in the meeting's language.
Leexi
Templates adapt per meeting type and are customizable, decisions, actions with suggested owners and deadlines are extracted, Ask Leexi searches the archive, minutes export to Word, PDF or Google Docs, and the summarizing models are named — OpenAI via Azure France and Mistral in the subprocessor list. We found no public information on selecting the summary language with German, nor on answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on.
Integrations, API & workflow
Fathom AI Notetaker
A real integration layer: the calendar connection is mandatory and read-only, HubSpot and Salesforce receive AI-extracted field sync, Slack, Asana, Notion, Zapier and Make are listed, and there is a documented REST API with webhooks, SDKs, OAuth and an MCP server at a public URL. Two CRMs is where the breadth stops — we found no public information on Microsoft Dynamics or Pipedrive, SharePoint or Confluence export, or recording rules per calendar or meeting type. A three-user-per-domain cap on CRM sync appears on the pricing page and deserves a look before anyone counts seats.
Leexi
Calendars including Exchange on-premise, a wide CRM list among them Dynamics and Pipedrive, Slack, Notion, SharePoint, Zapier, Make, webhooks, a public REST API with reference documentation, and an MCP server with OAuth scopes and read-only tools — a layer a builder can start from. We found no public information on API rate limits, versioning, or data residency maintained across integrations.
Consent, participant rights & works council
Fathom AI Notetaker
The terms forbid using the service if any participant does not consent to be recorded, and the data processing agreement promises reasonable assistance with a data protection impact assessment — that is the whole story. We found no public information on a recording notice to guests, a participant opt-out or way to stop a recording, or rules for when the assistant joins automatically. Coaching metrics and AI scorecards exist as features with no documented default-off or off switch, and there is no works-council pack or works-agreement template that we could find.
Leexi
The vendor states participants must be informed before recording begins and cites the EU AI Act Article 50 transparency duty, calendar-connected auto-join is configurable, and deleted files are irrecoverable. We found no public information on an opt-out or stop control for the person being recorded, on whether the individual scorecards and AI coaching in Leexi Coach are off by default or switchable per organisation, or on a works-council pack or DPIA support.
Retention, AI training & administration
Fathom AI Notetaker
Retention is configurable with regional storage options and audit logs described for admins, SSO with SCIM provisioning exists, encryption and a SOC 2 Type II audit are stated, and third parties are barred from training on your content — with the in-house training on de-identified data openly disclosed and an opt-out. But the default retention reads only "as long as necessary or legally required", backups persist up to 30 days after deletion, and we found no public information on discarding audio after transcription, SAML specifically, legal hold, or export of the full archive.
Leexi
A Governance module carries retention policies (two-year default reducible in settings, six months on Starter), audit logs, SSO with SCIM and eight roles; ten subprocessors are named with regions, encryption in transit and at rest is stated, ISO 27001:2022 is certified, and at contract end the archive is returned or deleted. The DPA review itself notes the non-training commitment lives in the privacy policy and compliance FAQ rather than in that contract, and we found no public information on discarding audio after transcription or zero retention at the AI and transcription subprocessors.
European sovereignty
Fathom AI Notetaker
The contracting entity is Fathom Video Inc., a Delaware corporation in San Francisco, and the privacy policy says plainly that the service is hosted in the United States. There is a Common Paper data processing agreement, Standard Contractual Clauses, Data Privacy Framework certification and an EU representative in Cork — safeguards for an American chain, not a European one — and the trust page that should list the subprocessors was captured empty, so I cannot say who else reads the recordings; Google Analytics and HubSpot appear as analytics providers. Regional storage options are mentioned for admins without any EU hosting being documented.
Leexi
Belgian contracting entity in Brussels, recordings and transcripts on AWS Paris with a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes, OpenAI's model run via Azure France in a closed circuit, Mistral and Gladia in the EU, a public DPA version 2.0, ISO 27001, and a ten-entry subprocessor list with locations. The vendor itself concedes AWS is theoretically subject to the US Cloud Act and points to Scaleway for strict sovereignty; we found no public information on European ownership beyond the registered share capital, and the contact-form CRM is a US-law tool.
Pricing transparency
Fathom AI Notetaker
Four price points are public: a free plan with unlimited recordings and no usage caps, Team at $15/month/per user, Business at $25/month/per user, and Enterprise at $35/month/per user annual only, each paid tier with a two-user minimum, plus a stated annual saving of 25% or more, currency, tax treatment and cancellation terms. What I still cannot compute: whether the listed prices are the monthly or the annual basis, what counts as a seat, and the price of the Launch Assist add-on, which the feature matrix marks with a dollar sign but no figure.
Leexi
Tiers are public — Starter 12€, AI-Meeting 23€, Business 39€ per licence per month, annual invoice excluding VAT, with a seven-day free trial, minimum users of 1 or 3, and volume discounts from 10 licences. Enterprise — which holds SSO, SCIM, audit logs and retention governance — is priced only on contact, and we found no public information on monthly billing, included minutes or credits, or overage handling.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
Fathom AI Notetaker
Leexi
Legal entity
Not determined
Not determined
Hosting location
Outside the EU
Not determined
Hosting options
Not determined
Not determined
Open source
Not determined
Not determined
Data processing agreement
Not determined
Not determined
Transfer impact assessment
Not determined
Not determined
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.
As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates Leexi higher: 3.5/5 against 2.5/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 0 of the 6 judges pick Fathom AI Notetaker and 6 pick Leexi. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.
Is Fathom AI Notetaker or Leexi European?
Fathom AI Notetaker is not European by provenance (Rest of world). Leexi is European (EU-Made). Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.
Where do Fathom AI Notetaker and Leexi store customer data?
Per the vendors’ own pages as captured — Fathom AI Notetaker: Outside the EU by default. Leexi: Default not stated; pages mention Europe.
Do Fathom AI Notetaker and Leexi have a free plan?
As of 6 Nov 2026, Fathom AI Notetaker’s own pages state a free plan; Leexi’s pages as captured do not. Each product page links the pricing page it was read from.