whats-best.ai

AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers · head-to-head

Fathom AI Notetaker vs Leexi

As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates Fathom AI Notetaker 2.5/5 and Leexi 3.5/5 in AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 0 of the 6 judges pick Fathom AI Notetaker and 6 pick Leexi. Fathom AI Notetaker scores higher on 1 of 7 criteria (Pricing transparency). Leexi scores higher on 6 of 7 criteria (European sovereignty, Recording, transcription & languages, Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge, plus 3 more). Provenance — Fathom AI Notetaker: Rest of world; Leexi: EU-Made. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.

Fathom AI Notetaker

Rest of world

Panel rating

Sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven

Full evaluation →

Leexi

EU-Made

Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Full evaluation →

The short answer

Six judges lean Leexi on five criteria: capture and transcription (7.0 vs 4.3), summaries and knowledge (7.2 vs 5.0), integrations and workflow (8.0 vs 7.0), data control and administration (7.0 vs 5.8) and sovereignty (8.0 vs 3.0). The bench splits elsewhere: pricing transparency is the one criterion where Fathom is ahead, 5.8 to 5.5 — three judges lean Fathom, one Leexi, two tie. Consent and codetermination: three judges lean Leexi, three tie, means 4.2 vs 3.7. Leexi's verdict documents AWS Paris storage, an Azure France closed circuit alongside Mistral, and ten subprocessors with regions; Fathom's privacy policy states United States hosting by Fathom Video Inc., and its trust-page subprocessor listing was captured empty. Fathom's judges split 4 to 6 on summaries and knowledge, over German-language minutes versus credited action items. Per-judge weighted totals run 4.5 to 5.3 for Fathom, 6.4 to 6.8 for Leexi.

Choose Fathom AI Notetaker if

  • You decide primarily on published pricing tiers: the bench leans Fathom on pricing transparency, three judges to one with two ties, means 5.8 vs 5.5.
  • Your meetings and minutes run in English only: Fathom's documented summaries are English-only, and the 4 to 6 split among its judges on summaries and knowledge turned on German-language minutes.
  • Your compliance framework accepts United States hosting: Fathom's data residency is recorded as non-EU, and its privacy policy states the service is hosted in the United States by Fathom Video Inc.

Choose Leexi if

  • You need EU data residency: Leexi stores recordings on AWS in Paris with a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes and runs OpenAI via Azure France in a closed circuit alongside Mistral; six judges lean Leexi on sovereignty, 8.0 vs 3.0.
  • You must review a subprocessor list before purchase: Leexi lists ten subprocessors with regions, while Fathom's trust-page subprocessor listing was captured empty.
  • Transcription quality is decisive for you: capture and transcription stands at 7.0 vs 4.3, with six judges leaning Leexi.
  • Your stack spans many platforms: Leexi joins ten conferencing tools including Teams, Google Meet, Zoom and Webex and feeds eleven CRMs including Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive; six judges lean Leexi on integrations and workflow, 8.0 vs 7.0.
  • You rely on meeting summaries for knowledge capture: summaries and knowledge stands at 7.2 vs 5.0 with six judges leaning Leexi, and Fathom's documented summaries are English-only.

Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Works Council Chair

Chairs the works council of a machine builder with 2,300 employees in Baden-Württemberg. Management wants a notetaker in every Teams meeting; the council has to agree to it under § 87 BetrVG first. Wants to know who is told that a recording runs and who can say no, whether talk time or engagement scores per person exist and can be switched off for good, how long recordings are kept, and material the vendor provides for a works agreement.

Fathom AI Notetaker

Leexi

This judge's pick

Criterion by criterion

Recording, transcription & languages

Fathom AI Notetaker

The captured pages show a bot that joins Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams and Slack Huddles, a bot-free beta on Mac that keeps speaker attribution and mute acknowledgment, and real-time capture, transcription and summarisation. We found no public information on supported languages with German stated, transcript editing, timestamps or accuracy, and the dedicated iOS app for in-person meetings is described as not live yet.

Leexi

The assistant joins ten conferencing services including Teams, Zoom, Google Meet and Webex, records in-person meetings from an iOS or Android app or the room's audio, captures VoIP calls, handles over 100 automatically detected languages, and runs speech-to-text through named providers (Gladia, ElevenLabs, Microsoft Azure Speech) with a company dictionary for jargon, acronyms and accents. We found no public information on botless capture, mixed-language meetings, per-language accuracy, or editing of the transcript.

Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge

Fathom AI Notetaker

Summaries with decisions and action items assigned by name, search, Ask Fathom questions across team calls, trackers and a shared workspace are documented, with automation recipes pushing tasks to Asana or Notion. The API reference, however, states the summary is "Always displayed in English", and we found no public information on German summaries, templates per meeting type, or answers that cite the transcript passage they rest on — thin ground for a German-language workforce.

Leexi

Summaries adapt to meeting type using the organisation's own templates, decisions, tasks with suggested owners and deadlines are extracted, Ask Leexi searches across meetings, minutes export to Word, Google Docs or PDF and land by email or on the CRM record, and the AI providers behind summaries (Mistral, Azure OpenAI) are named. The archive is queryable through the MCP server under the account's existing permissions; we found no public information on choosing the summary language or on answers citing the transcript passage they rest on.

Integrations, API & workflow

Fathom AI Notetaker

The notes reach the systems where work happens: a documented REST API with webhooks and SDKs, an MCP server for ChatGPT, Claude and other tools, CRM field sync into Salesforce and HubSpot with no manual entry, plus Slack, Asana, Notion, Zapier and Make. We found no public information on recording rules per calendar or meeting type, SharePoint or Confluence export, or CRMs beyond Salesforce and HubSpot.

Leexi

Calendars from Google, Outlook and on-premises Exchange drive automatic joining with manual invitation as an alternative, eleven CRMs including HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive and Dynamics receive notes, Slack, Notion, Google Docs and SharePoint take the output, and a public REST API with reference documentation plus a read-only MCP server with scoped access are documented. Rate limits, API versioning and central administration of integrations are not described.

Consent, participant rights & works council

Fathom AI Notetaker

The terms forbid using the service if any participant does not consent, the bot appears in the participant list, and the data processing agreement promises assistance with a data protection impact assessment. Beyond that we found no public information on a notice to external guests, a participant opt-out, admin rules for when the assistant joins, per-person analytics being switchable off, or any works-council information pack or works-agreement template — while coaching metrics and AI scorecards are advertised as features. Before I could agree to this under § 87 BetrVG, the vendor would have to answer in writing who is told a recording runs and who can stop it.

Leexi

The pages state plainly that participants must be informed before recording begins, that the vendor enforces default consent and the EU AI Act transparency duty, and that the CNIL rules out permanent systematic recording — useful lines for a works agreement — and joining can be governed by admin settings. But we found no public information on a participant opting out or stopping a recording, no statement that the Coach module's evaluation scorecards and performance analysis are off by default or can be switched off for the organisation, and no works-agreement template; the compliance dossier covers hosting, subcontractors and certifications only.

Retention, AI training & administration

Fathom AI Notetaker

The stated default retention is "as long as necessary or legally required", with custom data retention policies, regional storage options and audit logs placed at the admin level for enterprise accounts; we found no public information on automatic deletion by policy or audio being discarded after transcription. Single sign-on with SCIM provisioning, admin sharing rules, encryption at rest and in transit, SOC 2 Type II, third parties barred from training on customer content and an opt-out from the vendor's in-house training on de-identified data are all documented — enough to negotiate on, not yet enough to sign.

Leexi

Retention is governable: a two-year default reducible by the client in platform settings, plan-specific periods, a Governance module with retention policy, eight roles, SSO with SCIM and audit logs, and deleted recordings unrecoverable. The ten subprocessors are listed with their regions, the DPA is public with 24-hour breach notification, audit rights and return-or-deletion at contract end, and no training on conversations is promised — though that commitment is documented in the privacy policy and FAQ rather than as a DPA clause. We found no public information on discarding audio after transcription, legal hold, or zero retention at subprocessors.

European sovereignty

Fathom AI Notetaker

The contracting entity is Fathom Video Inc., a Delaware corporation in San Francisco, the privacy policy states the service is hosted in the United States, and the terms run under California law with binding arbitration. An EU representative in Cork, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework certification and a published data processing agreement exist, but we found no public information on European hosting, and the trust-page subprocessor list shows no entries in the captured version, so the AI and transcription providers behind the product remain unnamed.

Leexi

Leexi SA is a Belgian public limited company in Brussels; recordings, transcripts and minutes are stored and processed on AWS in Paris with a Scaleway option above certain licence volumes, and the language model runs as OpenAI via Azure France in a closed circuit alongside Mistral in the EU. All ten subprocessors are listed with locations in the EU, Europe or the UK, a public data processing agreement exists, and ISO 27001:2022 is stated. The default host is a US company theoretically subject to the Cloud Act and the fully sovereign Scaleway option is conditional on licence volume, which keeps this short of the top level.

Pricing transparency

Fathom AI Notetaker

The pricing page publishes Team at $15 /month / per user (2 user min), Business at $25 /month / per user (2 user min), Enterprise at $35 /month / per user annual only, annual billing saving 25%+, a free plan with unlimited recordings and no usage caps, and cancellation without penalty. We cannot compute the full cost: single sign-on, custom retention and the Launch Assist add-on are not priced publicly, and we found no public information on VAT treatment or what counts as a seat beyond the two-user minimum.

Leexi

Three of four plans carry public licence prices — Starter 12€/month (15€ regular), AI-Meeting 23€/month (29€), Business 39€/month (49€), each per licence per month on annual invoice excluding VAT — plus volume discounts from ten licences, minimum user counts, a seven-day free trial and no setup cost. The Enterprise tier is price-on-request, what counts as a seat is not stated, and monthly billing and per-plan storage are not fully described, so a buyer cannot compute the complete annual cost from the pages alone.

Sovereignty, side by side

Dimension Fathom AI Notetaker Leexi
Legal entity Not determined Not determined
Hosting location Outside the EU Not determined
Hosting options Not determined Not determined
Open source Not determined Not determined
Data processing agreement Not determined Not determined
Transfer impact assessment Not determined Not determined

Facts, side by side

Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.

Compliance · DPA https://fathom.ai/dpa · yes1

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

yes2

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

Integrations · Public API yes · yes1

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

Public API to integrate Leexi into your tools2

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

Integrations · Webhooks yes3

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

yes4

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

Legal · DPA available https://fathom.ai/dpa5

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

yes6

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

Legal · Entity Fathom Video Inc. · 2261 Market Street #4156, San Francisco, CA 941141

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

Belgium7

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

Pricing · Business price usd · 2 · 258

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

excl. VAT · per licence per month · annual invoice · yes · 49 · 20 · 399

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

Pricing · Enterprise price usd · yes · 358

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

yes · yes9

captured 5 Nov 2026 · Report an error

Questions about Fathom AI Notetaker and Leexi

Which is better, Fathom AI Notetaker or Leexi?

As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates Leexi higher: 3.5/5 against 2.5/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 0 of the 6 judges pick Fathom AI Notetaker and 6 pick Leexi. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.

Is Fathom AI Notetaker or Leexi European?

Fathom AI Notetaker is not European by provenance (Rest of world). Leexi is European (EU-Made). Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.

Where do Fathom AI Notetaker and Leexi store customer data?

Per the vendors’ own pages as captured — Fathom AI Notetaker: Outside the EU by default. Leexi: Default not stated; pages mention Europe.

Do Fathom AI Notetaker and Leexi have a free plan?

As of 6 Nov 2026, Fathom AI Notetaker’s own pages state a free plan; Leexi’s pages as captured do not. Each product page links the pricing page it was read from.