immocloud is ahead on WEG accounting (mean 1.7 vs 0.8; 4 judges lean immocloud, 2 tie), owner self-service (2.2 vs 0.0), maintenance and defects (2.2 vs 0.0) and sovereignty (4.0 vs 2.7) — on those last three, the lean is 6 judges to immocloud, 0 to vermietet.de. Its attributes record German jurisdiction, EU-only data residency and US Cloud Act subprocessor exposure; vermietet.de's recorded attributes read unknown. vermietet.de is ahead on pricing transparency (6.8 vs 3.2; 6 judges lean vermietet.de): its pages state 9,90€/month base including one unit, plus 0,99€ per additional unit, where the only tier figure captured for immocloud is "Auf Anfrage" from 50 units. Assembly and resolutions ties at 0.0 and documents and handover at 3.0, with 6 ties on each. Weighted totals span 2 to 2.9 for immocloud and 1.3 to 2 for vermietet.de — but the leans split by criterion, and that split is the result here.
Choose immocloud if
You need WEG accounting covered at all: 4 judges lean immocloud there (mean 1.7 vs 0.8), 0 lean vermietet.de, 2 tie.
Your owners expect self-service access: owner self-service reads 2.2 vs 0.0, with 6 judges leaning immocloud.
Your workflow runs through maintenance and defect handling: 2.2 vs 0.0 there, with 6 judges leaning immocloud.
Your data-protection officer asks about the vendor's footing: immocloud's attributes record German jurisdiction and EU-only data residency (with subprocessor exposure recorded as US Cloud Act), and the Data Protection Officer weighted total reads 2.9 vs 1.7.
Choose vermietet.de if
You need a computable price before committing: 6 judges lean vermietet.de on pricing transparency (6.8 vs 3.2).
Your portfolio grows unit by unit and you budget per unit: the stated terms are 9,90€/month base including one unit, plus 0,99€ per additional unit.
You want to test before paying: the published terms include a 30-day all-features trial that ends automatically, with no credit card or bank data required.
Your buying process needs a figure on the page rather than a quote: the only tier figure captured for immocloud is "Auf Anfrage" from 50 units, while vermietet.de's price is computable from its captured terms.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The Accountant
Prepares the settlement and answers for its form. Cares that the Abrechnungsspitze is shown separately, that the Rücklage is genuinely segregated trust money rather than a labelled balance, and that heating costs apportion per HeizkostenV without a spreadsheet.
immocloud
This judge's pick
vermietet.de
Criterion by criterion
Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage
immocloud
The published modules are rental bookkeeping — a Finanz module with bank transactions fetched and categorised via finAPI, DATEV-Export, meter management and a tenant utility settlement promising results 'in 5 Minuten statt Stunden'. I found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung in the BGH form with a separately shown Abrechnungsspitze, community distribution keys, or a Rücklage segregated as trust money — as evidenced, this is general bookkeeping only.
vermietet.de
The only settlement engine on record is the tenant-facing Nebenkostenabrechnung with a Schnellstart-Assistent — a tenancy product, not the community's Jahresabrechnung. There is no Wirtschaftsplan, no distribution keys (MEA, units, consumption), no Abrechnungsspitze, no HeizkostenV apportionment for the WEG, and the Rücklage as segregated trust money is not a concept anywhere in the evidence; the finance features are rent-receipt checks and an income/expense overview, i.e. general bookkeeping.
Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung
immocloud
The feature lists name Mietverwaltung, Mietvertrag and Kommunikation, but I found no public information on convening an owners' meeting, agendas and notice periods, voting or majority arithmetic, or a maintained Beschluss-Sammlung. With nothing published on the meeting, this criterion sits at the bottom of the scale.
vermietet.de
Not a word about convening, notice periods, agendas, proxies, voting or a Beschluss-Sammlung in either captured page — the stated scope is finances, documents, listings and portfolio insights. That is rubric level 0 by pure absence.
Owner & tenant self-service
immocloud
A Mieterportal is listed in the plan features, so a portal exists — but the evidence is entirely tenant-facing. I found no public information on per-owner logins, owners' own statements and documents, meeting papers in the portal, or a defect form whose status the reporter can see.
vermietet.de
The portal is the landlord's own cockpit ('Objekt in Meine Immos hinterlegen'); there is no per-owner scoping for a community, no owner/tenant visibility separation, no defect form and no mechanism for a WEG owner to see the records. For this criterion the product offers no portal at all.
Maintenance, defects & contractors
immocloud
Vorgangsmanagement appears in the published module list, which is where defect intake would live, but the captures stop at the module name. I found no public information on defect records with status and photos, contractor work orders, a recurring maintenance calendar, or statutory inspections with proof of completion stored.
vermietet.de
No defect intake, no recurring maintenance calendar, no statutory inspection tracking and no contractor assignment anywhere on the evidence; the closest thing is 'Vorlagen für alle Vermieteranliegen'. rubric level 0 by absence — nothing here builds an operating record for a building.
Documents, retention & handover
immocloud
There is a Dokumente module, a Dokumenteneingangsemail for intake, and a DATEV-Export — central storage in some form. I found no public information on version history, search across the archive, retention periods for community records (the only retention statements found cover job applications at six months and Sentry data at 90 days), or a defined handover export for a successor administrator.
vermietet.de
There is genuine central storage — 'Alle Dokumente sicher ablegen' with OCR upload and a document assistant — which clears rubric level 3's bar. But nothing evidences versioning, retention periods or a defined handover export; at a Verwalterwechsel this is a folder copy with nice OCR.
European sovereignty
immocloud
The contracting entity is immocloud GmbH, Toulouser Allee 23a, Düsseldorf (HRB 101443, Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, USt-IdNr. DE306967777), and the privacy policy names its processors: finAPI for banking data, Frisbii Germany for billing, Intercom for live chat, and Sentry for error monitoring 'hosted on Google Cloud Platform' with a DPA and AES-256 encryption. But we found no public information on where the application data itself is hosted or who owns the company — an EU entity with named processors, yet hosting unstated and one processor on US cloud with no stated region.
vermietet.de
The vendor is Scout24 SE of Munich, so the contracting entity is European, but the pipeline records no sovereignty attributes: hosting location unstated, no subprocessor list, no certification — rubric level 3's 'subprocessor list is absent' branch. Where the community's books would physically live is simply not evidenced.
Pricing transparency
immocloud
The pricing page publishes structure I can work with: terms of '3 Monate' or '12 Monate -10%', a unit defined as 'Wohnung, Garage / Stellplatz oder ein Gewerbe', 'Alle angegebenen Preise netto zzgl. 19 % MwSt.', and named extra costs for Briefversand and digitale Mietverträge. But the only tariff figure captured is 'Tycoon Ab 50 Einheiten* Auf Anfrage', and we found no public information on euro amounts for the other tariffs or on setup and migration fees — so the annual invoice is not computable from what is published.
vermietet.de
Unusually clean: 9,90 €/Monat incl. one unit plus 0,99 € per additional unit, monthly billing, anytime cancellable, and 'alle Funktionen' in one flat offer — so the annual invoice for n units is arithmetically derivable with no unpriced module bundles. It falls short of rubric level 8 because VAT treatment and any setup or export fee are not stated anywhere.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
immocloud
vermietet.de
Legal entity
Incorporated in DE
Not determined
Ownership
Not determined
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
Not determined
Not determined
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.