immocloud is ahead on WEG accounting (mean 1.7 vs 0.8; 4 judges lean immocloud, 2 tie), owner self-service (2.2 vs 0.0), maintenance and defects (2.2 vs 0.0) and sovereignty (4.0 vs 2.7) — on those last three, the lean is 6 judges to immocloud, 0 to vermietet.de. Its attributes record German jurisdiction, EU-only data residency and US Cloud Act subprocessor exposure; vermietet.de's recorded attributes read unknown. vermietet.de is ahead on pricing transparency (6.8 vs 3.2; 6 judges lean vermietet.de): its pages state 9,90€/month base including one unit, plus 0,99€ per additional unit, where the only tier figure captured for immocloud is "Auf Anfrage" from 50 units. Assembly and resolutions ties at 0.0 and documents and handover at 3.0, with 6 ties on each. Weighted totals span 2 to 2.9 for immocloud and 1.3 to 2 for vermietet.de — but the leans split by criterion, and that split is the result here.
Choose immocloud if
You need WEG accounting covered at all: 4 judges lean immocloud there (mean 1.7 vs 0.8), 0 lean vermietet.de, 2 tie.
Your owners expect self-service access: owner self-service reads 2.2 vs 0.0, with 6 judges leaning immocloud.
Your workflow runs through maintenance and defect handling: 2.2 vs 0.0 there, with 6 judges leaning immocloud.
Your data-protection officer asks about the vendor's footing: immocloud's attributes record German jurisdiction and EU-only data residency (with subprocessor exposure recorded as US Cloud Act), and the Data Protection Officer weighted total reads 2.9 vs 1.7.
Choose vermietet.de if
You need a computable price before committing: 6 judges lean vermietet.de on pricing transparency (6.8 vs 3.2).
Your portfolio grows unit by unit and you budget per unit: the stated terms are 9,90€/month base including one unit, plus 0,99€ per additional unit.
You want to test before paying: the published terms include a 30-day all-features trial that ends automatically, with no credit card or bank data required.
Your buying process needs a figure on the page rather than a quote: the only tier figure captured for immocloud is "Auf Anfrage" from 50 units, while vermietet.de's price is computable from its captured terms.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The Portfolio Manager
Runs a firm managing several thousand units and lives on throughput. Wants statutory inspections scheduled with proof stored, defects that route to the right trade, multi-community reporting, and onboarding a new WEG that takes days rather than a quarter.
immocloud
This judge's pick
vermietet.de
Criterion by criterion
Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage
immocloud
The published modules show general finances, meter readings and a tenant-side utility settlement ("Nebenkostenabrechnung in 5 Minuten") with DATEV export, but I found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a WEG Jahresabrechnung, MEA or unit-based distribution keys, or separate reserve accounting. For my portfolio that is disqualifying territory regardless of the rest.
vermietet.de
Landlord bookkeeping only — Mieteingangscheck, income/expense overview and a tenant-facing Nebenkostenabrechnung; no Wirtschaftsplan, no WEG Jahresabrechnung, no distribution keys, no Rücklage separation. That is the anchor-0 description; I nudge to 1 only because a settlement document of some kind exists.
Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung
immocloud
The published module list runs from rent management through finance, communication and documents, and I found no public information on convening owners' meetings, agenda structure, voting, minutes or a Beschluss-Sammlung. Nothing here helps me run a Versammlung or defend a resolution after the fact.
vermietet.de
The entire the evidence is silent on meetings, invitations, voting, proxies or a Beschluss-Sammlung. Under rubric level 0, that absence is the score.
Owner & tenant self-service
immocloud
A tenant portal is offered as a base feature, but I found no public information on an owner login, per-owner statements, meeting papers or a defect form with status visible to the reporter. The statutory disclosure duty would still land on my staff's desks.
vermietet.de
The only self-service is the landlord's own 'Meine Immos' login; there is no owner or tenant portal, no per-owner scoping and no defect or request form. Nothing an Eigentümer could use to exercise their disclosure rights.
Maintenance, defects & contractors
immocloud
Case management appears as a module name alongside AI receipt capture, yet I found no public information on a recurring maintenance calendar, statutory inspections with proof of completion stored, contractor assignment with work orders, or warranty tracking. That is the core of my operating record and it is unevidenced.
vermietet.de
Not a single fact on defect intake, contractor work orders, recurring maintenance or statutory inspections with proof. For a portfolio of my size that is disqualifying and scores 0 by the anchor.
Documents, retention & handover
immocloud
A documents module and a document-intake email exist, which reads as central storage with upload; I found no public information on version history, retention periods for community records, full-text search or a defined handover export for a successor administrator. Handover would be a manual scramble.
vermietet.de
'Dokumentenablage' with templates and a document-assistant gives central storage, but no versioning, no retention policy and no defined handover export are evidenced. That is the anchor-3 description verbatim.
European sovereignty
immocloud
The imprint gives a German GmbH with a Handelsregister entry, and the privacy policy names subprocessors including Frisbii, finAPI, Sentry (hosted on Google Cloud Platform) and Intercom. I found no public information on where the application itself is hosted, on ownership, or on any certification, which keeps this short of a comfortable score.
vermietet.de
The vendor is Scout24 SE of Munich per the provenance, but the pipeline records no sovereignty attributes: hosting is unstated and no subprocessor list appears. rubric level 3 fits — an absent subprocessor list — and I take no comfort from a German brand name alone.
Pricing transparency
immocloud
The pricing page states the unit definition, terms of 3 or 12 months with a 10 percent reduction on the twelve-month option, net prices plus 19 percent VAT, and flags postal dispatch and digital rental contracts as extra costs — but the tier from 50 units upward is "Auf Anfrage". I found no public information on setup or migration fees, so I cannot compute the annual cost for a serious portfolio from public pages alone.
vermietet.de
Public, computable per-unit maths: 9,90€/month base incl. one unit plus 0,99€ per additional Wohneinheit, monthly billing, anytime cancellation, everything in one bundle with no hidden modules. It stops short of rubric level 8 because VAT treatment is not stated and setup/migration costs are simply unmentioned rather than declared.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
immocloud
vermietet.de
Legal entity
Incorporated in DE
Not determined
Ownership
Not determined
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
Not determined
Not determined
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.