immocloud is ahead on WEG accounting (mean 1.7 vs 0.8; 4 judges lean immocloud, 2 tie), owner self-service (2.2 vs 0.0), maintenance and defects (2.2 vs 0.0) and sovereignty (4.0 vs 2.7) — on those last three, the lean is 6 judges to immocloud, 0 to vermietet.de. Its attributes record German jurisdiction, EU-only data residency and US Cloud Act subprocessor exposure; vermietet.de's recorded attributes read unknown. vermietet.de is ahead on pricing transparency (6.8 vs 3.2; 6 judges lean vermietet.de): its pages state 9,90€/month base including one unit, plus 0,99€ per additional unit, where the only tier figure captured for immocloud is "Auf Anfrage" from 50 units. Assembly and resolutions ties at 0.0 and documents and handover at 3.0, with 6 ties on each. Weighted totals span 2 to 2.9 for immocloud and 1.3 to 2 for vermietet.de — but the leans split by criterion, and that split is the result here.
Choose immocloud if
You need WEG accounting covered at all: 4 judges lean immocloud there (mean 1.7 vs 0.8), 0 lean vermietet.de, 2 tie.
Your owners expect self-service access: owner self-service reads 2.2 vs 0.0, with 6 judges leaning immocloud.
Your workflow runs through maintenance and defect handling: 2.2 vs 0.0 there, with 6 judges leaning immocloud.
Your data-protection officer asks about the vendor's footing: immocloud's attributes record German jurisdiction and EU-only data residency (with subprocessor exposure recorded as US Cloud Act), and the Data Protection Officer weighted total reads 2.9 vs 1.7.
Choose vermietet.de if
You need a computable price before committing: 6 judges lean vermietet.de on pricing transparency (6.8 vs 3.2).
Your portfolio grows unit by unit and you budget per unit: the stated terms are 9,90€/month base including one unit, plus 0,99€ per additional unit.
You want to test before paying: the published terms include a 30-day all-features trial that ends automatically, with no credit card or bank data required.
Your buying process needs a figure on the page rather than a quote: the only tier figure captured for immocloud is "Auf Anfrage" from 50 units, while vermietet.de's price is computable from its captured terms.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The Data Protection Officer
The system holds names, addresses, bank details and arrears for people who never chose the vendor. Wants owner and tenant visibility strictly separated, an access log over the archive, retention that executes, and an answer on where the AI invoice reader sends a document.
immocloud
This judge's pick
vermietet.de
Criterion by criterion
Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage
immocloud
The published modules are rental bookkeeping — utility-cost settlement advertised as "Nebenkostenabrechnung in 5 Minuten", meter management, automatic payment reminders and DATEV export — while I found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, an annual settlement in the statutory community form, MEA-weighted distribution keys or separate reserve-fund accounting. Consumption-based apportionment for tenants puts this slightly above plain bookkeeping, but the statutory community financial cycle is not evidenced.
vermietet.de
This is a single-landlord finance tracker: Einnahmen-/Kostenübersicht, Mieteingangscheck and a tenant-facing Nebenkostenabrechnung with an auto-fill assistant — no Wirtschaftsplan, no WEG-Jahresabrechnung, no distribution keys for a community, and the Rücklage concept does not exist here. The provenance note itself says it was included to be judged against WEG duties it does not target, and the evidence confirms that.
Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung
immocloud
Nothing in the captured pages mentions owners' meetings: I found no public information on invitation or agenda support, voting or majority arithmetic, or a maintained resolution register. The published modules run to communication and case management and stop before anything meeting-related.
vermietet.de
The full feature enumeration across both registry entries — listings, insights, finance, documents, pricing — contains nothing on meetings, invitations, voting or a Beschluss-Sammlung. Score 0: meeting support is simply not part of this product.
Owner & tenant self-service
immocloud
A tenant portal with SMS direct messages and a document-intake email are published, but I found no public information on a per-owner login, on how owner and tenant visibility is separated, or on defect reports with status visible to the reporter. A portal exists on the tenant side; the scoping that would let an owner exercise the right to see the records is not evidenced.
vermietet.de
The only tenant-facing capability evidenced is exposure via ImmoScout24 listings with 'unbegrenzte Mieteranfragen'; there is no portal login, no per-unit scoping, no statements, no defect form. Tenants here are prospects, not self-service users, and WEG owners are outside the product's model entirely.
Maintenance, defects & contractors
immocloud
The module list names "Vorgangsmanagement" and meter management, and I found no public information on contractor assignment with work orders, a recurring maintenance calendar, or statutory inspections such as fire safety and drinking water. A module name with no described defect records, evidence trail or warranty tracking leaves this near the bottom of the scale.
vermietet.de
Nothing in the registry mentions defect intake, maintenance schedules, inspections or contractors — the closest items are a 'Dokumente-Assistenz mit Analyse und Empfehlungen' and templates, which are document aids, not building management. Defects evidently arrive outside the system.
Documents, retention & handover
immocloud
Central documents are a named module with an intake email, and DATEV export gives a defined path for financial data, but I found no public information on versioning, full-text search, retention executed for community records, an access log over the archive, or a handover package for a successor. The only retention commitments published are job applications deleted after six months and error-monitoring data at ninety days — neither touches the property archive.
vermietet.de
There is a 'Dokumentenablage' with upload, templates and a document-analysis assistant — that is central storage per portfolio, and nothing more: no versioning, no retention policy, no export or handover path. From my seat the absence of any retention statement and any access log over that archive is the decisive gap.
European sovereignty
immocloud
A German contracting entity and named subprocessors — Frisbii in Frankfurt, finAPI, Intercom, and Sentry hosted on Google Cloud Platform — appear in the privacy policy, but I found no public information on where the application and its document store are hosted, and the AI receipt capture names no processor at all, so I cannot tell where a document sent to it goes. Website analytics run through Google Ireland, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity and others.
vermietet.de
The evidence records no sovereignty attributes at all: hosting location unstated, subprocessor list absent, and the 'Dokumenten-Upload mit automatischer Texterkennung' sends names, addresses and bank details into an OCR service nobody has named or located. Scout24 SE being Munich-based is the only mitigating fact, and it is not evidenced in the registry — hence below the anchor that at least names the chain.
Pricing transparency
immocloud
The pricing pages are clear on structure — a unit defined as flat, garage or commercial, terms of 3 or 12 months with a stated discount, net prices plus 19 percent VAT, and postal delivery and digital rental contracts named as extra costs — but the top tier is quoted only as "Auf Anfrage", and I found no public information on the euro amounts for the extra costs or per-unit figures for the tiers. An administrator still cannot compute an annual invoice from these pages.
vermietet.de
The annual invoice is publicly computable: 9,90€/month base including one unit plus 0,99€ per additional unit, monthly billing, 30-day trial ending automatically, cancellable anytime, no card required — effectively one priced bundle with all features. VAT treatment is the one stated gap, and no export/exit fee appears, so it falls just short of the 8 anchor.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
immocloud
vermietet.de
Legal entity
Incorporated in DE
Not determined
Ownership
Not determined
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
Not determined
Not determined
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.