immocloud is ahead on WEG accounting (mean 1.7 vs 0.8; 4 judges lean immocloud, 2 tie), owner self-service (2.2 vs 0.0), maintenance and defects (2.2 vs 0.0) and sovereignty (4.0 vs 2.7) — on those last three, the lean is 6 judges to immocloud, 0 to vermietet.de. Its attributes record German jurisdiction, EU-only data residency and US Cloud Act subprocessor exposure; vermietet.de's recorded attributes read unknown. vermietet.de is ahead on pricing transparency (6.8 vs 3.2; 6 judges lean vermietet.de): its pages state 9,90€/month base including one unit, plus 0,99€ per additional unit, where the only tier figure captured for immocloud is "Auf Anfrage" from 50 units. Assembly and resolutions ties at 0.0 and documents and handover at 3.0, with 6 ties on each. Weighted totals span 2 to 2.9 for immocloud and 1.3 to 2 for vermietet.de — but the leans split by criterion, and that split is the result here.
Choose immocloud if
You need WEG accounting covered at all: 4 judges lean immocloud there (mean 1.7 vs 0.8), 0 lean vermietet.de, 2 tie.
Your owners expect self-service access: owner self-service reads 2.2 vs 0.0, with 6 judges leaning immocloud.
Your workflow runs through maintenance and defect handling: 2.2 vs 0.0 there, with 6 judges leaning immocloud.
Your data-protection officer asks about the vendor's footing: immocloud's attributes record German jurisdiction and EU-only data residency (with subprocessor exposure recorded as US Cloud Act), and the Data Protection Officer weighted total reads 2.9 vs 1.7.
Choose vermietet.de if
You need a computable price before committing: 6 judges lean vermietet.de on pricing transparency (6.8 vs 3.2).
Your portfolio grows unit by unit and you budget per unit: the stated terms are 9,90€/month base including one unit, plus 0,99€ per additional unit.
You want to test before paying: the published terms include a 30-day all-features trial that ends automatically, with no credit card or bank data required.
Your buying process needs a figure on the page rather than a quote: the only tier figure captured for immocloud is "Auf Anfrage" from 50 units, while vermietet.de's price is computable from its captured terms.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The WEG Administrator
Manages forty communities and personally carries the duties the WEG places on the Verwalter. Wants the statutory year — Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung, Versammlung, Beschluss-Sammlung — discharged inside one system. Judges a product by the March settlement run, not the demo.
immocloud
This judge's pick
vermietet.de
Criterion by criterion
Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage
immocloud
What the captured pages show is rental bookkeeping — a finance module with bank-transaction categorisation via finAPI, meter management, and a "Nebenkostenabrechnung in 5 Minuten" aimed at tenancies — plus a DATEV export that hands the real accounting to the Steuerberater. I found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung in the form the BGH requires, distribution keys by Miteigentumsanteil, or separate trust accounting for the Rücklage. For the March settlement run across forty communities, essentially none of the statutory financial cycle is evidenced.
vermietet.de
Income/expense overview, rent receipt checks and a landlord-tenant Nebenkostenabrechnung are all the evidence evidences; no Wirtschaftsplan, no WEG-Jahresabrechnung, no distribution keys, no Rücklage separation. That is general bookkeeping with a rental utility statement — rubric level 0 territory, one point for the settlement helper existing.
Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung
immocloud
Nothing in the published material touches the owners' meeting — no convening tool, no agenda structure, no voting support and no maintained Beschluss-Sammlung; the module list stops at Kommunikation and Direktnachrichten per SMS. I found no public information on any meeting or resolution-register support. If I ran the Versammlung on this, the protocol and the register would live somewhere else entirely.
vermietet.de
Both pages are entirely silent on convening, agenda, minutes, voting and any Beschluss-Sammlung, so the meeting is supported nowhere and rubric level 0 applies.
Owner & tenant self-service
immocloud
A Mieterportal is listed among the base features, but nothing describes what it actually shows an owner. I found no public information on a per-owner login, owner statements, meeting papers, or a defect form with status visible to the reporter. Nothing here evidences the disclosure duty an Eigentümer can enforce.
vermietet.de
No owner portal, per-owner scoping or record-inspection route appears anywhere; the only tenant-facing feature is free ImmoScout24 listings for a landlord's vacancies, which is not a WEG owner's disclosure channel. Every request would remain email or post.
Maintenance, defects & contractors
immocloud
The module list names "Vorgangsmanagement" and nothing more on the building side. I found no public information on defect records with photos and status, work orders to contractors, a recurring maintenance calendar, or statutory inspections for lift, heating or fire safety. A single module name is not an operating record I could defend when something goes wrong.
vermietet.de
No defect intake, no recurring maintenance schedule, no contractor assignment on either page; rubric level 0 governs the silence.
Documents, retention & handover
immocloud
A Dokumente module and a document-intake email are listed, which points to central storage with upload. I found no public information on version history, full-text search, retention periods for community records, or a defined handover export for a successor administrator — the only retention statements captured concern job applications and error logs. Handover as a statutory event is not addressed anywhere in the material.
vermietet.de
"Dokumente sicher ablegen" with analysis assistance and templates is central storage plus upload, but there is no versioning, no retention policy and no defined handover export — precisely rubric level 3.
European sovereignty
immocloud
The contracting entity is German — Handelsregister Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, USt-IdNr. DE306967777 — and the privacy policy names processors including Frisbii Germany GmbH in Frankfurt, finAPI GmbH and Intercom, with Sentry stated to run on Google Cloud Platform. But I found no public information on where the application itself and its ledger are hosted, or whether the processor list is complete. For the files of forty communities, that gap matters.
vermietet.de
The vendor is Scout24 SE, Munich — so not a non-EU vendor — but the record shows no sovereignty attributes at all: hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, no certification published. rubric level 3's absent-subprocessor situation fits, and for community records that silence is itself a shortcoming.
Pricing transparency
immocloud
The pricing page is structured: units defined (Wohnung, Garage/Stellplatz, Gewerbe), terms of 3 or 12 months with "-10%" on the longer, all prices "netto zzgl. 19 % MwSt.", and Briefversand and digitale Mietverträge flagged as additional costs. But the tier from 50 units is "Auf Anfrage", the amounts of those additional costs are not shown, and I found no public information on setup or migration fees — so the annual invoice for my portfolio is not computable from the public pages alone.
vermietet.de
9,90 €/month base including one unit, 0,99 €/month per additional unit, monthly billing, cancellable anytime and all features in a single plan make the annual figure computable, lifting it above rubric level 5's unpriced-bundle case. It falls short of 8 because VAT treatment and any setup or migration cost are nowhere stated.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
immocloud
vermietet.de
Legal entity
Incorporated in DE
Not determined
Ownership
Not determined
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
Not determined
Not determined
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.