immocloud is ahead on WEG accounting (mean 1.7 vs 0.8; 4 judges lean immocloud, 2 tie), owner self-service (2.2 vs 0.0), maintenance and defects (2.2 vs 0.0) and sovereignty (4.0 vs 2.7) — on those last three, the lean is 6 judges to immocloud, 0 to vermietet.de. Its attributes record German jurisdiction, EU-only data residency and US Cloud Act subprocessor exposure; vermietet.de's recorded attributes read unknown. vermietet.de is ahead on pricing transparency (6.8 vs 3.2; 6 judges lean vermietet.de): its pages state 9,90€/month base including one unit, plus 0,99€ per additional unit, where the only tier figure captured for immocloud is "Auf Anfrage" from 50 units. Assembly and resolutions ties at 0.0 and documents and handover at 3.0, with 6 ties on each. Weighted totals span 2 to 2.9 for immocloud and 1.3 to 2 for vermietet.de — but the leans split by criterion, and that split is the result here.
Choose immocloud if
You need WEG accounting covered at all: 4 judges lean immocloud there (mean 1.7 vs 0.8), 0 lean vermietet.de, 2 tie.
Your owners expect self-service access: owner self-service reads 2.2 vs 0.0, with 6 judges leaning immocloud.
Your workflow runs through maintenance and defect handling: 2.2 vs 0.0 there, with 6 judges leaning immocloud.
Your data-protection officer asks about the vendor's footing: immocloud's attributes record German jurisdiction and EU-only data residency (with subprocessor exposure recorded as US Cloud Act), and the Data Protection Officer weighted total reads 2.9 vs 1.7.
Choose vermietet.de if
You need a computable price before committing: 6 judges lean vermietet.de on pricing transparency (6.8 vs 3.2).
Your portfolio grows unit by unit and you budget per unit: the stated terms are 9,90€/month base including one unit, plus 0,99€ per additional unit.
You want to test before paying: the published terms include a 30-day all-features trial that ends automatically, with no credit card or bank data required.
Your buying process needs a figure on the page rather than a quote: the only tier figure captured for immocloud is "Auf Anfrage" from 50 units, while vermietet.de's price is computable from its captured terms.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The Skeptic
Has read many pages claiming "WEG-konform" and wants the feature that makes it true — the post-2021 settlement form, the maintained Beschluss-Sammlung, the majority arithmetic. Also reads for the per-unit minimum, the setup fee, and what it costs a community to leave with its own records.
immocloud
This judge's pick
vermietet.de
Criterion by criterion
Wirtschaftsplan, Jahresabrechnung & Rücklage
immocloud
The published modules cover a finance module with automatic bank-transaction categorisation, meters, a rental utility settlement promised 'in 5 Minuten', and DATEV export — but everything shown reads tenancy-side. We found no public information on a Wirtschaftsplan, a Jahresabrechnung in the post-2021 form, distribution keys for owners, or any separate handling of the Rücklage.
vermietet.de
The ledger here is a private landlord's: an 'Einnahmen- und Kostenübersicht', a rent-receipt check, and a tenant-facing Nebenkostenabrechnung with an auto-fill wizard — no Wirtschaftsplan, no Jahresabrechnung in any WEG form, no MEA- or unit-based distribution keys, and the word Rücklage never appears in the record.
Eigentümerversammlung & Beschluss-Sammlung
immocloud
Nothing in the captured pages mentions an owners' meeting, invitations, minutes, voting arithmetic or a Beschluss-Sammlung; the module list runs from Nebenkosten to Zähler and names no meeting or resolution component. On this evidence the meeting is convened, run and recorded entirely outside the system.
vermietet.de
Nothing in the entire registry convenes, runs or records an owners' meeting: no invitations, no agenda structure, no voting or majority arithmetic, no Beschluss-Sammlung — the anchor-0 case exactly, not merely a thin one.
Owner & tenant self-service
immocloud
The only portal named is the Mieterportal, aimed at tenants, with documents arriving via an intake email address. We found no public information on a per-owner login, an owner's view of their statements or meeting papers, or a defect form with status visibility — the owner's right to inspect the records is not addressed on these pages.
vermietet.de
The only self-service is the landlord's own — 'Meine Immos', document storage, templates, portfolio insights; there is no per-owner scoping, no tenant view, no defect or request form evidenced anywhere, so the disclosure duty is discharged by nothing at all.
Maintenance, defects & contractors
immocloud
The module list names Vorgangsmanagement and Zähler, but the captured pages never describe defect records with photos, contractor assignment, or a recurring maintenance calendar. We found no public information on statutory inspections, warranty periods, or the evidence trail a community would need when something goes wrong; the only automation shown is reminders about open rent.
vermietet.de
Defects and maintenance are simply absent from the record: no ticket list, no recurring inspection or Wartung calendar, no contractor assignment; the 'Vorlagen für alle Vermieteranliegen' are the nearest artefact and they are static templates, not tracking.
Documents, retention & handover
immocloud
Central document storage is evidenced as a module plus a document-intake email, and nothing more: the retention statements on the privacy page cover job applications and error logs, not the community's archive. We found no public information on versioning, full-text search, retention periods for property records, or any defined handover export — the DATEV export is an accounting interface, not a successor administrator's package.
vermietet.de
'Alle Dokumente sicher ablegen' with OCR upload and document assistance is central storage with folders — rubric level 3 — but the evidence shows no versioning, no retention periods, and no defined handover export, so a community leaving gets folders copied, not a register.
European sovereignty
immocloud
A German contracting entity is documented in the imprint, and the privacy policy names finAPI, Frisbii and Sentry — but Sentry runs on Google Cloud Platform with no region stated, and the site itself carries Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar and Microsoft Clarity. We found no public information on where the application or its documents are hosted, on ownership, or on a complete subprocessor list for the core service.
vermietet.de
Scout24 SE of Munich is at least an EU contracting entity, but the pipeline records 'no sovereignty attributes on record': hosting location, subprocessor list and certification are all unstated, and unstated is not sovereign no matter how German the parent company.
Pricing transparency
immocloud
The pricing pages state the unit definition, billing terms of 3 or 12 months with a 10% discount for twelve, net prices plus 19% VAT, and which extras cost more — but the only tier figure captured is 'Auf Anfrage' for the Tycoon tier from 50 units, the very segment an administrator of communities sits in, and the extras carry no amounts. We found no public information on setup or migration fees or on any exit or export cost.
vermietet.de
The annual bill is genuinely computable from public pages — 9,90€/month base incl. one unit plus 0,99€ per additional Wohneinheit, monthly billing, anytime-cancellable, trial without card or bank data — docked to 7 because VAT treatment and any tier/module boundary beyond 'alle Funktionen' are not stated.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
immocloud
vermietet.de
Legal entity
Incorporated in DE
Not determined
Ownership
Not determined
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
Not determined
Not determined
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.