CRM
Livespace
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Livespace sp. z o.o. · www.livespace.io
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Livespace is a Warsaw-based CRM (Livespace sp. z o.o.) that scores highest on contact management and lowest on sovereignty. Contacts split into Companies and People lists with custom fields, ownership and merging that carries tasks, deals, wall posts and files — though duplicate finding requires the Automation plan or higher and admin permission, and merges cap at ten contacts. Sales pipeline scores 4-5: required data entry, two-way if-then rules and unlimited saved processes (BANT, Sandler) are real; we found no public information on forecasting, quotas or custom report builders. Automation and integrations sit mid-scale on no-code sequences, Sales Bot routing, a free API and two-way Google Calendar sync. Data portability draws the widest range, 4 to 6 — self-serve import and export with a full undo, against a 4 MB import cap and list-level export covering companies, persons, deals, finances, tasks and spaces. Hosting, a data processing agreement and subprocessors are unknown; the visible signals are a Warsaw vendor and Polish-language support. No prices appear; the only cost statements are a 14-day free trial and a free-of-charge API.
Speaks for it
- Contacts live as separate Companies and People lists with custom fields, ownership and visibility limits, and merges that carry over tasks, deals, files and wall posts.
- Pipeline enforcement is real, with required data entry per step, two-way if-then rules and unlimited saved sales processes switchable mid-deal with history preserved.
- Import is self-serve with field mapping, duplicate matching by Tax ID or Regon, four conflict-handling options and a full undo.
- The API is free of charge for every account, documented, with a PHP SDK and write access up to adding, deleting and unblocking users.
- No-code automations include email sequences that run until a response, with configurable send windows, conditional follow-up tasks and a Sales Bot routing leads by source or team availability.
Held against it
- Finding duplicates requires the Automation plan or higher and admin permissions, and bulk merging is capped at ten contacts at once.
- We found no public information on forecast views, quota tracking, win/loss capture or a custom report builder.
- The captured pages give no public information on hosting location, a data processing agreement or a subprocessor list; a Warsaw vendor and Polish-language support are the visible signals.
- The 4 MB import cap forces splitting larger files, and notes, correspondence and files are not among the documented exportable entities.
- Automation scope, the number of active sales processes and connected email accounts (2 to 10) all depend on the plan, with no published figures.
Best for
- You need a CRM that enforces a defined sales process — required data entry per step, two-way if-then rules, multiple processes by segment, role or deal value — configured without code.
- You are migrating lists of contacts, companies and deals yourself and want self-serve import with duplicate matching and a full undo.
- You want no-code email sequences and Sales Bot lead routing that reps can set up without a consultant.
- You are a Polish-speaking team that values a Warsaw-based vendor with a Polish-language product and support.
Avoid if
- Your purchase requires a data processing agreement or documented hosting before signature; the visible sovereignty evidence is a Warsaw vendor and Polish-language support, with hosting, a data processing agreement and subprocessors unknown from the captured pages.
- Your finance team needs forecasts, quota tracking or custom reports; the analytics shown measure conversion per stage and offer AI pattern suggestions.
- Two-way email inbox sync is your must-have integration; the documented sync covers Google Calendar, and we found no public information on email sync.
The scores
Contact & data model
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.
0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.
3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.
5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.
8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.
10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.
The Solo Seller
Companies and People live as separate lists with custom fields, ownership, visibility limits and segmentation, and the merge tooling is real — merging up to ten contacts at once carries over tasks, deals, custom fields and files, with dedupe matching on Tax ID, Regon and contact details. But duplicate finding is gated to the Automation plan or higher, and I found no public information on field-level history or field-level permissions, so the model serves a solo seller well without ever reaching the depth of an 8. 2 3 11
The Data Protection Officer
Contacts split into companies and people with profiles carrying correspondence, tasks, notes and deals, plus admin-defined custom fields and ownership on every record; duplicate matching on Tax ID and Regon with merge tooling that transfers files, wall posts and deals, a default-contact rule and bulk merge up to ten is genuinely serious hygiene. Duplicate search sits behind the Automation plan and admin permissions, and I found no public information on field-level permissioning or field validation, which keeps it below the top band. 2 3 11
The Sales Ops Lead
Companies and people sit on separate lists with custom fields, changeable ownership, visibility limits and full correspondence history on the profile, and merging transfers deals, tasks, files and wall posts when reps collide records. Dedupe matching also runs on import with rules like Tax ID or name plus contact details, though finding duplicates requires the Automation plan and an admin, and merging is capped at ten records at a time. We found no public information on field validation, field-level permissions or custom objects, which keeps complex models in workaround territory. 2 3 11
The RevOps Integrator
Companies and people live as separate, related records with custom form fields, ownership, visibility limits and segmentation, and the dedupe story is unusually concrete: import matching by Tax ID and Regon, suggested-duplicate review with a reject button, and merges that carry over tasks, deals, wall posts and files. I found no public information on field-level validation, permissioned field access or custom objects, so a complex revenue model still bends the vendor's way rather than the reverse. 2 3 11
The Migrator
Companies and people are proper separate objects with custom fields across persons, companies and deals, ownership changes, visibility limits, and a merge that genuinely carries over tasks, deals, files and wall posts. But duplicate search needs admin permission and the Automation plan or higher, and bulk merging stops at ten contacts — hygiene is a paid privilege. We found no public information on custom objects, field-level history, or field-level validation. 2 3 11
The Skeptic
Companies and People live as separate, well-populated profiles — notes, correspondence, deals, connections, tagging — with admin-defined custom fields, ownership, permissions and visibility limits, plus genuine merge tooling that carries tasks, deals, wall posts and files across. The catch is the paywall: finding duplicates requires the Automation plan or higher, and we found no public information on field types, validation or field-level permissions. 2 3 11
Pipeline & forecasting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.
0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.
3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.
5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.
8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.
10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.
The Solo Seller
This is where Livespace genuinely enforces a process: two-level stages with steps, required data entry before a step can be marked done, two-way if-then rules, BANT/Sandler templates and unlimited saved processes you can switch mid-deal with history preserved. The reporting evidence stops at conversion per stage and where deals get stuck — I found no public information on forecast views, quota tracking or a custom report builder, so finance-grade roll-ups are unproven. 4 5
The Data Protection Officer
Multiple sales processes — unlimited saved, by role, segment or deal value, reassignable mid-deal with history preserved — and a two-level stage-and-step structure with required data entry give real process discipline. But I found no public information on win/loss capture, forecast views, quota tracking or a custom report builder; the captured pages describe conversion analytics and AI pattern hints only. 4 5
The Sales Ops Lead
The process engine is genuinely enforceable: steps can require missing fields before completion, two-way rules tie fields to stages, unlimited sales processes can be designed per segment, role or deal value, and Sales Bot routes leads by industry, source or team availability. But the reporting story stops at stage-conversion analytics and AI pattern suggestions; we found no public information on forecast views, quota tracking, historical snapshots or a custom report builder, and a forecast my CFO signs needs those. 4 5 6
The RevOps Integrator
Process enforcement is real — a two-level structure of stages and steps, required data before a step completes, and multiple processes assignable by segment, deal value or team role, switchable mid-deal with history preserved. The reporting shown is canned conversion analytics; I found no public information on forecasting views, quota tracking, win/loss capture or a custom report builder, so nothing here is reporting a finance department would sign. 4 5
The Migrator
Process enforcement is real: required data entry on steps, two-way if-then rules between fields and stages, unlimited saved processes assignable by segment, deal value or team role, with prior stages preserved when a deal changes process. Reporting evidence stops at built-in conversion analytics showing where deals get stuck. We found no public information on forecast views, quota tracking, win/loss reasons or a custom report builder — nothing here a finance department signs. 4 5
The Skeptic
Required data entry per step, two-way if-then rules and multiple processes with BANT or Sandler templates show a pipeline that enforces a process, and per-stage conversion analytics are claimed on the product page. But the number of active sales processes depends on the subscription plan, and we found no public information on forecasting views, quota tracking or a custom report builder — the reporting a finance department would demand is unevidenced. 4 5
Automation & workflows
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.
0 — No automation beyond email templates.
3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.
5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.
8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.
10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.
The Solo Seller
Set up in an afternoon without code: if-then rules tied to process steps, sequences that add tasks after each stage change, email sequences with delays, sending windows, conditional follow-up tasks and stop-on-response, plus Sales Bot routing leads by industry, source or team availability. The cap is the tier — duplicate finding, automation scope and 2-to-10 email accounts all depend on the plan — and I found no public information on webhooks as steps, sequence analytics or per-step logs, which holds it at the middle anchor. 3 6 7
The Data Protection Officer
If-then rules tied to process steps with two-way field/step logic, task sequences after each stage change, email sequences with sending windows, conditional reminder tasks and templates, and a Sales Bot distributing leads by industry, source or availability form a credible multi-step, no-code picture. The scope is stated to depend on the plan and active process counts are plan-dependent, and I found no public information on branching, webhooks, error handling or per-step logs. 5 6 7
The Sales Ops Lead
Email sequences run until a response with configurable send windows, conditional follow-up tasks, variables and templates, stage changes auto-spawn the next tasks, and rules attach directly to process steps — real multi-step automation a rep configures without code or a consultant. The scope is explicitly capped by plan, multiple connected mailboxes start at the Automation tier, and we found no public information on webhooks as workflow steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics or error handling. 6 7
The RevOps Integrator
Multi-step email-and-task sequences with delays, conditional follow-up tasks, saved templates and pause/resume sit alongside if-then rules wired into process steps and a Sales Bot that routes leads by source and team availability — usable without a consultant. Scope is explicitly capped by plan, and I found no public information on webhooks as workflow steps, round-robin routing, error handling or per-step logs. 6 7
The Migrator
Multi-step email sequences with send windows, conditional task steps and automatic reminder tasks, if-then rules tied to process steps, and a Sales Bot routing leads by industry, source or team availability — the genuine multi-step, delayed, routed thing. The vendor states plainly that the scope of automations depends on your plan, and even duplicate search is reserved for the Automation tier. We found no public information on webhooks as workflow steps or per-step analytics beyond a sequence progress bar. 3 6 7
The Skeptic
Email sequences with configurable send windows, conditional follow-up tasks and response-based branching, if-then rules tied to process steps, and a Sales Bot that routes leads by source or team availability are all publicly documented. The scope of automations depends on the plan with no public numbers for any tier — the feature is its own upsell — and we found no public information on webhooks as steps, error handling or per-step logs. 6 7
Integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.
0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.
3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.
5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.
8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.
10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.
The Solo Seller
The API is free of charge for every account, comprehensively documented, with a PHP SDK, support-assisted setup and even user management from the API; Google Calendar syncs tasks two ways and Make/Zapier fill the gaps. But the captured pages show calendar sync for tasks only — I found no public information on two-way email sync for Gmail or Outlook, on Microsoft calendar support, or on webhooks, and inbox sync is the one integration I cannot live without. 2 8 9
The Data Protection Officer
Two-way Google Calendar sync with task-type filtering, a free, documented API with a PHP SDK and support assistance, plus Make, Zapier and automatic form-to-CRM contact creation are evidenced. The API surface actually described is narrow — contacts from forms and user add/delete/unblock — the documentation ships without example implementations, and I found no public information on two-way email sync, webhooks, OAuth apps or a native integration directory. 2 8 9
The Sales Ops Lead
The API is free of charge, documented and write-capable — it auto-adds form contacts and even manages users — with a PHP SDK, two-way Google Calendar sync with task-type filtering, and Make or Zapier connectors for contact creation. We found no public information on email sync, Microsoft calendar sync, webhooks or a native integration directory, so the revenue stack beyond Google and the automation platforms is unevidenced. 2 8 9
The RevOps Integrator
Google Calendar sync is the real thing — instant in both directions with task-type filtering each way — and the API is free for every account, documented, with a PHP SDK and write access covering contacts and user management. The rest of the stack story runs through Zapier and Make as middleware; I found no public information on two-way email sync, webhooks, OAuth apps, rate limits or a native connector directory, which is exactly what I need before this CRM anchors a revenue stack. 2 8 9
The Migrator
Two-way Google Calendar sync moving tasks instantly both directions, plus a documented API that is free of charge, can write contacts and even manage users, with a PHP SDK and Make or Zapier alongside. The calendar evidence covers Google only. We found no public information on two-way email sync, Microsoft calendars, webhooks, API rate limits or a native app directory, so this lands between a read-mostly API and the full two-way stack. 2 8 9
The Skeptic
A free-of-charge documented API with a PHP SDK and write operations up to adding, deleting and unblocking users, plus genuine two-way Google Calendar sync and Make/Zapier connections, clear the mid bar. But the documentation ships without example implementations, and we found no public information on two-way email sync, other native calendar or mail providers, webhooks, or API rate limits. 2 8 9
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.
0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.
3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.
5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.
8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.
10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.
The Solo Seller
The vendor presents as Livespace sp. z o.o. of Warsaw with a Polish-language product and support, which is a better starting point for me than a US default. Beyond that I found no public information on where data is hosted, a DPA, or a subprocessor list, so nothing here can actually be verified before I hand over customer data. 1
The Data Protection Officer
The vendor is Livespace sp. z o.o. in Warsaw with Polish-language support, and a European entity is the right starting point for a database of other people's personal data. That is essentially all the evidence offers: I found no public information on hosting location, a data processing agreement, a subprocessor list, consent fields, or retention and deletion controls, so a DPO could not sign off this posture without a caveat file. 1
The Sales Ops Lead
The vendor is a Polish company and the product and support ship in Polish, which is a European starting point, but that is where the public record ends. We found no public information on data residency, a DPA, a subprocessor list, retention or deletion controls — the documents a DPO needs before signing were not in the captured pages. 1
The RevOps Integrator
The vendor is a Warsaw-registered company selling and supporting the product in Polish, which points the right direction. Beyond that, I found no public information on data residency, hosting, a DPA or subprocessors — nothing here a DPO could review or sign. 1
The Migrator
The vendor presents as Livespace sp. z o.o. of Warsaw with a Polish-language homepage and Polish-language support, so the selling entity appears to be in the EU. We found no public information on data residency or hosting location, a published DPA, a subprocessor list, retention or deletion controls. An EU entity with none of the paper trail visible sits near the bottom of this criterion, not at zero. 1
The Skeptic
A Warsaw company with Polish-language pages is the only sovereignty signal the captured pages offer. We found no public information on hosting location, a data processing agreement, subprocessors, retention or deletion controls — nothing a data protection officer could sign off on, and nothing that says whose law can reach the data. 1
Import, export & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.
0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.
3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.
5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.
8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.
10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.
The Solo Seller
Getting in is genuinely self-serve: import from Excel, ODS or CSV with field mapping across persons, companies and deals, dedupe handling per row conflict, tags, source assignment and a full UNDO of a bad import — though files are capped at 4 MB. Getting out covers companies, persons, deals, finances, tasks and spaces to Excel or CSV with an admin-visible export history, but notes, correspondence and files are not in the documented export list, so the exit is partial rather than complete. 8 10 11
The Data Protection Officer
Import is self-serve across.csv,.ods,.xls and.xlsx with field mapping for persons, companies and deals, four duplicate-handling modes, tagging and source assignment, and a full undo of a failed import — undo is an operator's friend. Export covers companies, persons, deals, finances, tasks and spaces to.xls or.csv with filtered and custom views and an admin-visible export history, but export is list-based, import files are capped at 4 MB, and I found no public information on getting notes, email history or attachments out; the free API at least helps rebuild elsewhere. 8 10 11
The Sales Ops Lead
Import is self-serve with field mapping across persons, companies and deals, duplicate matching on Tax ID or contact details, four conflict-handling options and a full undo — though a 4 MB file cap forces splitting large migrations. Export covers companies, persons, deals, finances, tasks and spaces to Excel or CSV with filtered and custom-view export plus an admin-visible export history including failed runs, but the captured pages do not show notes, files or correspondence among exportable entities, and the free API is the only other exit route. 8 10 11
The RevOps Integrator
Export is self-serve to XLS or CSV across companies, people, deals, finances, tasks and spaces, with filtered subsets, custom views and an admin-visible export history including failed runs; import maps across three objects with duplicate policies, tagging and a full undo. It is honest list-level export, but I found no public information on exporting attachments, correspondence or full activity history, and the 4 MB import cap will pinch anyone bringing real history. 10 11
The Migrator
Import is close to what I demand: self-serve from.csv,.ods,.xls or.xlsx with field mapping across persons, companies and deals, duplicate matching on Tax ID, Regon and contact details, four conflict strategies and a full undo of a botched import. Export is self-serve to.xls or.csv with filters and an admin-visible export history — but the documented exportable entities are companies, persons, deals, finances, tasks and spaces, and we found no public information on exporting notes, email correspondence or files. The 4 MB import cap forces splitting any real database, though the API being free of charge means leaving is at least not metered. 2 8 10 11
The Skeptic
Getting in is genuinely self-serve: file import with field mapping across persons, companies and deals, duplicate matching by Tax ID or contact details, handling options and a full undo — though imported files should not exceed 4 MB. Export covers companies, persons, deals, finances, tasks and spaces to Excel or CSV with filtering and an administrator-visible export history including failed runs, but we found no public information on exporting files, attachments or activity history, or on migration tooling from other CRMs. 8 10 11
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.
5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.
8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.
10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.
The Solo Seller
I pay with my own card and I cannot compute a single invoice: the pages name an Automation plan and higher tiers that gate duplicates, automation scope, active processes and the number of connected email accounts, yet I found no public price figures — no per-seat cost, billing period, VAT treatment or stated limits. Plan-dependent gating with no published boundaries is exactly the pricing fog I reject, so this sits at the bottom of the scale for me. 3 6 7
The Data Protection Officer
No price for any tier appears in the captured pages — not a per-seat figure, a billing period or a VAT treatment — so nothing about the real invoice is computable from public evidence. Meanwhile the captured pages state that duplicate finding, automation scope, the number of active sales processes and the count of connectable email accounts all depend on the plan, without figures for any of them. 3 5 6 7
The Sales Ops Lead
A pricing page is referenced and tier names like Automation appear throughout, but I found no public price figures in the captured pages — no per-seat cost, billing period or VAT treatment. Plan-dependent limits compound it: the number of active sales processes, duplicate finding, automation scope and connected email accounts all depend on the plan, and none of those boundaries carry numbers a buyer could compute an invoice from. 3 5 6 7
The RevOps Integrator
Named tiers surface only through gating rules — duplicate finding needs the Automation plan, multi-account email starts there, active sales processes and automation scope depend on plan — and the pages point to a pricing page for details. I found no public information on any actual price, billing period, VAT treatment or seat minimum in these captures, so no invoice can be computed and the real cost of core hygiene features stays opaque. 3 5 6 7
The Migrator
The captured pages reference tiers — the Automation package and higher, plan-dependent automation scope, plan-dependent active processes, duplicate search from the Automation plan — without attaching a single price to any of them. The only cost statements anywhere are a 14-day free trial and an API described as free of charge. We found no public information on per-seat prices, billing periods, VAT treatment or renewal terms, so no invoice can be computed from public material. 3 5 6 7 8
The Skeptic
We found no public pricing information at all — not a tier price, a seat rate, a billing period or VAT treatment. The only pricing facts published are gates: the number of active sales processes depends on the plan, automation scope depends on the plan, duplicate finding starts at the Automation plan, and email accounts run from 2 to 10 by package — a buyer cannot compute any invoice, at entry or at renewal. 3 5 6 7
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on compliance on the pages we read (livespace.io, support.livespace.io/en/articles/5330760-contacts-companies-and-people, support.livespace.io/en/articles/4464135-duplicated-contacts, livespace.io/en/product/sales-process, support.livespace.io/en/articles/5224659-multiple-sales-processes, livespace.io/en/product/sales-automations and 5 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 3 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (11)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.livespace.io Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Contact & data model — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Contact & data model — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Integrations & API — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Integrations & API — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →