whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

Livespace

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Livespace sp. z o.o. · www.livespace.io

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Solo Seller

Weighted verdict

Runs their pipeline between customer calls and pays with their own card. Optimizes for a CRM that is set up in an afternoon, priced honestly at 1-5 seats, and never asks them to configure an object model. Rejects seat minimums and features held hostage in enterprise tiers.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Solo Seller

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The Solo Seller

Companies and People live as separate lists with custom fields, ownership, visibility limits and segmentation, and the merge tooling is real — merging up to ten contacts at once carries over tasks, deals, custom fields and files, with dedupe matching on Tax ID, Regon and contact details. But duplicate finding is gated to the Automation plan or higher, and I found no public information on field-level history or field-level permissions, so the model serves a solo seller well without ever reaching the depth of an 8. 2 3 11

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The Solo Seller

This is where Livespace genuinely enforces a process: two-level stages with steps, required data entry before a step can be marked done, two-way if-then rules, BANT/Sandler templates and unlimited saved processes you can switch mid-deal with history preserved. The reporting evidence stops at conversion per stage and where deals get stuck — I found no public information on forecast views, quota tracking or a custom report builder, so finance-grade roll-ups are unproven. 4 5

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The Solo Seller

Set up in an afternoon without code: if-then rules tied to process steps, sequences that add tasks after each stage change, email sequences with delays, sending windows, conditional follow-up tasks and stop-on-response, plus Sales Bot routing leads by industry, source or team availability. The cap is the tier — duplicate finding, automation scope and 2-to-10 email accounts all depend on the plan — and I found no public information on webhooks as steps, sequence analytics or per-step logs, which holds it at the middle anchor. 3 6 7

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The Solo Seller

The API is free of charge for every account, comprehensively documented, with a PHP SDK, support-assisted setup and even user management from the API; Google Calendar syncs tasks two ways and Make/Zapier fill the gaps. But the captured pages show calendar sync for tasks only — I found no public information on two-way email sync for Gmail or Outlook, on Microsoft calendar support, or on webhooks, and inbox sync is the one integration I cannot live without. 2 8 9

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The Solo Seller

The vendor presents as Livespace sp. z o.o. of Warsaw with a Polish-language product and support, which is a better starting point for me than a US default. Beyond that I found no public information on where data is hosted, a DPA, or a subprocessor list, so nothing here can actually be verified before I hand over customer data. 1

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The Solo Seller

Getting in is genuinely self-serve: import from Excel, ODS or CSV with field mapping across persons, companies and deals, dedupe handling per row conflict, tags, source assignment and a full UNDO of a bad import — though files are capped at 4 MB. Getting out covers companies, persons, deals, finances, tasks and spaces to Excel or CSV with an admin-visible export history, but notes, correspondence and files are not in the documented export list, so the exit is partial rather than complete. 8 10 11

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Solo Seller

I pay with my own card and I cannot compute a single invoice: the pages name an Automation plan and higher tiers that gate duplicates, automation scope, active processes and the number of connected email accounts, yet I found no public price figures — no per-seat cost, billing period, VAT treatment or stated limits. Plan-dependent gating with no published boundaries is exactly the pricing fog I reject, so this sits at the bottom of the scale for me. 3 6 7

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Livespace? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (11)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage www.livespace.io Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Contact & data model — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Contact & data model — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Integrations & API — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Integrations & API — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap support.livespace.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →