Project Management & Collaboration
Productive
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Productive International d.o.o. · productive.io
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
No written verdict for this product
The panel scored Productive, but the summary our synthesizer wrote did not survive our own contradiction check — twice. Rather than print a paragraph we cannot stand behind, we print none. Every score, rationale and source below is unaffected; read them and draw the conclusion yourself.
The scores
Collaboration depth
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Data Protection Officer
Task dependencies are first-class — blocking, waiting-on and linked types with Gantt visualization, subtask dependencies, no limit per task and status propagation on close — and comments carry attachments, pinning, quoting, rich text and a hidden-from-client toggle, with every task holding a full activity feed including linked emails. Capacity shows up through the workload field and over/under-capacity reporting, and permissions, teams and employee fields are configured at organization level. We found no public information on guest or client portal access beyond the client-visible comment distinction, and moving a task between projects deletes its dependencies, so this sits just under the top of the team-level planning band. 5 6 7 11
The Bootstrapper
Task dependencies come in Blocking, Waiting on and Linked flavors with no count limit, subtask dependencies and Gantt visualization, while capacity-and-availability reporting with a workload field plus over/under-capacity and overtime-by-person views makes team planning first-class. Comments are rich — pinning, quoting, attachments, "Hidden from client" — with permission sets and teams behind them. We found no public information on guest or client accounts as such, so client involvement rests on comment visibility control alone. 5 6 7 11
The Enterprise Architect
Dependencies are first-class — Blocking, Waiting on and Linked types with Gantt visualization, no count limit, propagation on close — and capacity, over/under-capacity and overtime reporting gives genuine team-level workload views, with permission sets and client-hidden comments covering outside visibility. Cross-project visibility comes through reports grouped by company, project and status. I found no public information on guest or client user seats as such, and moving a task to another project deletes its dependencies — a rough edge I would want answered before rollout. 5 6 7 8 11
The UX Purist
Team-level planning is the real thing: a full dependency model (blocking, waiting, linked, unlimited, subtasks, Gantt visualization), dense comments with attachments, quoting, pinning and hidden-from-client visibility, plus permission sets and capacity/over-under workload reports. It stops short of the top because the docs state that moving a task to another project deletes its dependencies, and capacity lives in reports rather than a dedicated planning surface. 5 6 7 8 11
The Integrator
Dependencies are first-class — blocking, waiting-on and linked types with no count limit, subtask dependencies, Gantt visualization and status cascades when a task closes — and every task carries a feed with rich comments, attachments, quoting, pinning and a hidden-from-client option that implies client-visible project work. Workload shows up through capacity, over/under-capacity and overtime reporting, and reports can group across Company > Project > Task Status, but we found no public information on a live workload planner or on guest and client accounts with their own permissions. 5 6 7 8
The Skeptic
Dependencies run deep — Blocking/Waiting/Linked types with no stated limit, subtask dependencies, Gantt visualization and automatic status propagation — and comments come with attachments, quoting, pinning and hidden-from-client visibility, alongside capacity/availability and overtime reporting and cross-project report grouping under permission sets. Two warts keep it off the top: moving a task to another project deletes its dependencies, and we found no public information on guest access as its own permission model. 5 6 7 8 11
Reporting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the tool can answer questions about the work: progress, time, budgets, utilization — and export the answer.
0 — No reporting beyond looking at the board.
3 — Fixed per-project status views only; nothing aggregates across projects and nothing exports cleanly.
5 — Useful standard reports (progress, tracked time) with basic filters and CSV export, but limited customization and no budget/utilization depth.
8 — Configurable cross-project reporting incl. time, budgets and utilization, with dashboards and reliable exports.
10 — Reporting is a product in itself: custom report builder, scheduled delivery, API access to every metric the UI shows.
The Data Protection Officer
The reporting surface is deep: a report library, saved reports with custom categories, OR and AND filters, multi-level grouping with relationship fields, pivots, drilldown, charts, cumulative formatting, a display-currency switcher and a documented table export, plus Pulse automation delivering reports on schedule to Slack. Utilization is covered by capacity-and-availability and overtime reports and financial data appears in report tables, but we found no public information on budget-specific report depth or API access to every metric the UI shows, which is what the reporting-as-a-product band requires. 7 8
The Bootstrapper
The Reports collection alone holds 22 articles: a prebuilt report library, data source selection, multi-level grouping, pivots, drilldown tables, OR and AND filters, and saved reports with custom categories, plus Pulse automation that ships reports to Slack. Budgets, payroll, intercompany hours and utilization (capacity and availability, over/under capacity, overtime by person) are all covered, and a table data export is documented. We found no public information on whether every metric the reports show is reachable through the API, which is what keeps this short of the top. 7 8 11
The Enterprise Architect
The report surface is close to a product in itself: a report library of prebuilt reports, saved reports with custom categories, multi-level grouping, pivots, drilldown, charts, OR/AND filters, currency switching and table export, with Pulse automating delivery into Slack. Budget warning thresholds, payroll, intercompany hours, overtime and capacity reporting cover the money side, and a documented Open API plus a full database copy on exit protects the answers. I found no public information confirming every metric shown in the interface is reachable through the API, which is what keeps this short of the top. 7 8 9 4 11
The UX Purist
This is a reporting product wearing a project tool's clothes: prebuilt report library, saved reports with custom categories, OR/AND filters, three-level grouping, pivots, click-through drilldowns, currency switching, automatic delivery via Pulse to Slack, and documented table export — time, budgets, capacity and payroll are all covered. I found no public information showing the API exposes every metric the UI shows, which is the one thing holding it back. 7 8 11
The Integrator
Reporting behaves like a product in itself: a 22-article reports collection covers a prebuilt report library, custom data sources, charts, OR/AND filters, capacity & availability with a workload field, hours over/under capacity, overtime by person, payroll, intercompany hours and absence allowances, with pivot, third-level grouping, relationship-field grouping, drilldown and a currency switcher on top. Scheduled delivery exists through Pulse, including straight to Slack. The captured pages document a table data export without format detail, and we found no public information on whether every metric shown in the interface is also reachable through the API. 7 8 9
The Skeptic
The reports surface is a real product: prebuilt report library, charts, pivot, third-level grouping, drilldown, OR/AND filters, currency switching, payroll/overtime/intercompany and over/under-capacity reports, automated Pulse delivery to Slack and documented table export, with budget warning policies behind it. We found no public information on dashboards as a standalone surface or on API access to every metric, so it stops just short of reporting-as-a-product. 7 8 11
Integrations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How well the tool connects to the rest of the stack: native integrations, calendar/comms hooks, API and webhooks, import/export paths.
0 — A closed box — no API, no integrations, CSV out if anything.
3 — A handful of marquee integrations, no public API or an API that covers a fraction of the product.
5 — The common set (calendar, Slack/Teams, file storage) plus a documented public API; automation platforms partially covered.
8 — Broad native catalogue, well-documented API and webhooks, first-class automation-platform support and real import paths from competitors.
10 — Ecosystem-grade: everything in 8 plus the tool is itself extensible (apps/plugins, AI/MCP surfaces) and exit via API export is complete.
The Data Protection Officer
A documented Open API with webhooks, event subscriptions and an API client sits alongside a wide native catalogue — seven accounting systems, eight HR systems, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, both calendars and both inboxes — plus Zapier and real import paths from Harvest and CSV. Exit is covered by a full database copy on leaving, which I weight heavily. An App Marketplace and AI connectors are named but not detailed, so we do not call this ecosystem-grade. 4 9 10 12
The Bootstrapper
The native catalogue is broad — QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite, Sage, Slack, Teams, Jira, HubSpot, Salesforce and seven HR systems — plus Zapier, and the Open API with webhooks and event subscriptions is documented at a public developer site. Import paths are real: a Harvest importer, CSV import, and personalized migration support; on exit "you get a full copy of your database". An App Marketplace and admin-controlled AI connectors push toward the top, though we found no public information on a plugin SDK or MCP surface. 4 9 10 11 12
The Enterprise Architect
The native catalogue is broad — accounting from QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite, Sage, Exact, Fortnox, Twinfield and Visma E-conomic, HR from Personio, BambooHR, HiBob and more, Salesforce, HubSpot, calendars, both inboxes, Slack, Teams and Jira — on top of Zapier, a documented Open API and webhooks with event triggers. Real import paths exist from Harvest and CSV for companies, contacts, time entries, expenses and tasks, and an app marketplace plus admin-controlled AI connectors and agents give it extensible surfaces. Exit is covered by a full database copy on leaving. 9 10 12 11 4
The UX Purist
Arrival, residence and exit are all covered: a real Harvest importer plus CSV paths in, a broad native catalogue across accounting, HR, sales, calendars, inboxes, Slack, Teams and Jira, a documented Open API with webhooks, event subscriptions and an API client, Zapier, an app marketplace and AI connectors, and a stated full copy of your database when you leave. I found no public information on a plugin or MCP surface, so it sits just under ecosystem-grade. 4 9 10 11 12
The Integrator
The connection surface is the strongest part of this product: an Open API with its own client and documentation plus event-triggered webhooks sent to a chosen URL, a broad native catalogue across accounting (QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage, NetSuite, Exact, Fortnox, Twinfield, Visma E-conomic), Google and Outlook calendars, Gmail and Outlook inboxes, Slack, Microsoft Teams, seven HR systems, HubSpot, Salesforce and Jira, plus Zapier. Real migration paths exist — CSV templates, a Harvest importer under Settings > Data import and task import into task lists — and on exit "you get a full copy of your database." An App Marketplace is named on one page and assistant connectors are admin-controlled, but we found no public information on a third-party plugin or extensibility surface. 4 9 10 11 12
The Skeptic
The native catalogue is broad — seven accounting systems, eight HR platforms, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Slack, Teams, both major calendar and inbox suites — on top of a documented Open API with webhooks, Zapier, CSV and Harvest importers and a stated full copy of your database on leaving. An app marketplace and admin-managed AI connectors, skills and agents signal extensibility, though we found no public information on third-party plugin depth, so I stop one notch short of the top. 4 9 10 11 12
Onboarding effort
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Time and friction from signup to first real value for a small team, without paid services.
0 — No self-serve path — onboarding starts with a sales call and an implementation project.
3 — Self-serve exists but the first project requires configuration a newcomer cannot judge yet (workflows, custom fields, permissions) before anything works.
5 — A team gets a first project running within a day; trial requires payment details or key steps live behind docs.
8 — Signup to working project inside an hour: guided setup, sensible defaults, templates, trial without payment details.
10 — Minutes to value even for non-tool-people, importers pull existing work in, and the tool teaches its own advanced features as the team grows into them.
The Data Protection Officer
A phased admin checklist deliberately sequences heavy configuration — time tracking, cost rates, service types, permission sets, SSO or 2FA — before anyone is invited, supported by an Academy course, an assistant tied to the Help Center, importers and personalized migration support on a free 14-day trial that is cancellable anytime. The billed-agency model means a newcomer must judge rates and permissions before real value arrives, which reads as within-a-day rather than within-an-hour; we found no public information on whether the trial requires payment details. 11 12 13
The Bootstrapper
There is a genuine self-serve path: a free 14-day trial cancellable anytime, a phased admin checklist, an Academy course with videos and practical tasks, a setup-aware assistant, and CSV/Harvest importers with personalized migration via in-app chat. But first value runs through cost rates, holiday calendars, permission sets and time-tracking policies — calls a newcomer cannot judge in hour one — and we found no public information on whether the trial asks for card details. Day one rather than hour one is what this evidence supports. 9 11 12 13
The Enterprise Architect
The free 14-day trial is self-serve with cancel-anytime, and CSV and Harvest importers plus a phased admin checklist with an Academy course make the path guided rather than improvised. But the checklist front-loads decisions a newcomer cannot yet judge — SSO or 2FA before inviting anyone, cost rates and holiday calendars before time is logged, permission sets and time-tracking policies — so first real value reads as a day, not an hour. I found no public information on whether the trial requires payment details. 11 12 9
The UX Purist
The phased admin checklist is sequenced the right way — set up the organization, configure daily use, refine as the team grows — and an Academy course with videos and practical tasks walks it hands-on, with importers to pull existing work in and a free 14-day cancel-anytime trial. But the pre-work list is heavy (cost rates needed the moment anyone logs time, login security decided before inviting anyone), and I found no public information on whether the trial skips payment details or how fast a first project actually comes up. 9 11 12 13
The Integrator
There is a genuine self-serve path: a free 14-day trial cancellable anytime, a phased admin checklist, an Academy course with videos and practical tasks, an assistant connected to the help center, and importers (CSV templates, Harvest, tasks) plus personalized migration support for heavier moves. The checklist itself signals the real cost, though: cost rates and a holiday calendar are "needed the moment anyone logs time", and permission sets, time-tracking policies, invoicing settings and the SSO-versus-2FA choice all land before inviting the team. We found no public information on time-to-first-project or whether the trial asks for payment details. 9 11 12
The Skeptic
The vendor's own admin checklist puts service types, rate cards, cost rates, time-tracking policies, invoicing tax rates, permission sets and an SSO/2FA decision ahead of inviting anyone — configuration a newcomer cannot yet judge — softened by a phased structure, an Academy course, CSV/Harvest/task importers and a 14-day trial with cancel anytime. Personalized migration support is gated behind an eligibility conversation in in-app chat. 11 12 13
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the company and the data actually sit: legal entity, ownership control, data residency, and subprocessor exposure to non-EU jurisdictions.
0 — Non-European vendor, data on US infrastructure under US law, no DPA worth the name.
3 — DPA and GDPR language present, but hosting defaults to the US or ownership sits outside Europe — compliance paperwork over substance.
5 — EU data residency is available and contractually fixed, but the vendor or its controlling owner is non-European, or core subprocessors put data within CLOUD Act reach.
8 — European company under European control with EU-resident data and a public DPA; remaining exposure is limited to identifiable subprocessors (e.g. a US hyperscaler's EU region) and is documented.
10 — European company, European control, EU-only data residency on European infrastructure, subprocessor list free of extraterritorial reach — verifiable, not asserted.
The Data Protection Officer
Servers are stated to be EU-hosted on Amazon AWS with encryption and controlled access, and there is genuine GDPR substance: a named DPO contact, Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers to the United States, a subprocessor documentation reference, and a deletion process with permanent deletion after retention. But the captured privacy policy names The Productive Company, Inc., a Delaware-based company, as the entity providing the Services while the vendor listing names Productive International d.o.o. of Zagreb — the captured pages give different signals on the contracting entity — and the subprocessor set includes US-incorporated Stripe, Recall (Hyperdoc Inc.) and Workable of Boston, so the extraterritorial exposure is identifiable but real. 3 4
The Bootstrapper
The captured privacy policy names "The Productive Company, Inc., a Delaware-based company" as the entity providing the services, discloses Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers to the United States, and names US-incorporated subprocessors (Stripe, Hyperdoc's Recall, Workable in Boston); the security page puts the servers on Amazon AWS hosted in the EU. Ownership is unverified and we found no public information fixing EU residency contractually. EU-hosted racks under a Delaware provider with US-reachable subprocessors is compliance paperwork around the edges, not European control. 3 4
The Enterprise Architect
The privacy policy names The Productive Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation with a Delaware mailing address, as the legal entity, and documents Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers to the United States, while the security page states EU-hosted Amazon AWS servers. The named subprocessors include Stripe, Workable of Boston and Recall (Hyperdoc Inc.), all US-incorporated, so US jurisdictional reach is identifiable and documented rather than hidden. I found no public information on ownership control or on EU residency being fixed contractually, and the contracting entity sitting in Delaware is the fact my procurement file will open with. 3 4
The UX Purist
Servers are stated as EU-hosted on Amazon AWS with encryption, backups and a referenced subprocessor list, but the captured privacy policy names The Productive Company, Inc., a Delaware-based company, as the entity providing the service, with Standard Contractual Clauses covering transfers to the United States and US-incorporated subprocessors (Stripe, Workable, Hyperdoc) in the chain. EU residency with non-European ownership and hyperscaler reach under the CLOUD Act is the middle of the scale; I found no public information confirming contractual data-residency guarantees or European ownership control. 3 4
The Integrator
The privacy policy names The Productive Company, Inc., a Delaware-based company with a USA mailing address, as the entity providing the services, and documents Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers to the United States, with Stripe for card processing and Workable (Boston) in the subprocessor flow. Data is stated to be hosted in the EU on Amazon AWS and Notetaker audio is processed on EU-based infrastructure exclusively, so residency language is present, but a US-incorporated provider with documented US transfers keeps this from reading as fully European. We found no public information on ownership, a contractually fixed residency commitment, or the subprocessor list beyond the reference to it. 3 4
The Skeptic
The privacy policy names The Productive Company, Inc., a Delaware-based company, as the provider of the services and uses Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers to the United States, while the security page states EU hosting on Amazon AWS with US-incorporated Stripe and a Boston-based applicant-tracking subprocessor in the chain. We found no public information on ownership control or on data residency being fixed in a contract rather than asserted on a web page. 3 4
Support & documentation
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stuck user gets unstuck: docs quality, support channels and their availability per plan, and the health of the learning surface.
0 — No docs beyond marketing pages; support is a contact form that may answer.
3 — Docs exist but are thin or stale; support on entry plans is effectively email-only with slow turnaround.
5 — Searchable help center covering the core product; chat or email support on all plans with reasonable response times.
8 — Deep, current docs incl. onboarding guides and templates; fast chat support not gated to top tiers; visible changelog.
10 — Docs, academy, community and support so good they are a reason to buy; SLAs published, support quality independent of plan.
The Data Protection Officer
Documentation is deep and current across onboarding, reports, integrations and admin setup, with an Academy issuing certificates, a community space, a status page and a published 99.9% uptime service level, while chat and email support advertises a four-minute average reply and 95.7% positive ratings. The Account Access support flow is unusually well governed — a stated reason, recorded sessions, time-limited and revocable by the customer — which is exactly the kind of access control I look for. We found no public information on a visible changelog or on support quality per plan, which keeps this just below the top band. 1 2 4 13 14
The Bootstrapper
Docs run deep (the Reports collection alone lists 22 articles), there is an Academy with certificates, a community, chat and email support with a four-minute average chat reply and an advertised 2m 56s response time, a public status page, a published 99.9% uptime service level, and a consented, session-recorded Account Access scheme for hands-on help. We found no public information on a changelog or on whether support quality varies by plan. Close to the top of the scale; those two gaps are what hold it. 1 2 4 7 13 14
The Enterprise Architect
Docs are deep and structured — a reports collection of 22 articles, an admin onboarding checklist, a Help Center-connected AI assistant, plus a public Academy with certificates, a community, API docs, a Trust Center and a status page. Chat and email support averages a four-minute reply with published 2m 56s response time and 95.7% positive ratings, and Account Access is unusually well governed: reason required, sessions recorded, time-limited and revocable at any time. I found no public information on a per-plan support SLA, on whether chat is gated to top tiers, or on a changelog. 2 13 4 14 11
The UX Purist
Chat and email with a stated four-minute average reply, a published 99.9% uptime service level, a status page, an Academy with certificates, a community, and an Account Access feature that is recorded, reason-gated and revocable — support built like a product, with a Help Center deep enough that the in-app assistant is wired into it. I found no public information on a changelog or on whether support quality varies by plan, which is all that keeps it off the top. 1 2 4 11 13 14
The Integrator
Documentation is deep and specific — a 22-article reports collection, precise semantics for dependencies, commenting, data migration and import, and a transparent support account-access model with recorded, time-limited, revocable sessions. The learning surface is real: Academy courses with shareable certificates, a community, a status page, a trust center and an assistant connected to the help center. Chat and email support advertises a four-minute average reply and 95.7% positive ratings, though we found no public information on a changelog or on how support channels vary by plan. 1 2 7 11 13 14
The Skeptic
Help center collections run deep — 22 reporting articles alone, a phased admin checklist, import guides — beside an Academy with certificates, a community, an in-app assistant that hands off to live chat, and unusually candid support-access controls (reason required, sessions recorded, revocable). The captured pages give different figures for uptime (100% over the past year versus a 99.9% service level), we found no public information on a product changelog or on which plans include chat, and the four-minute reply claim is a homepage self-report. 1 2 4 7 13 14
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Can a buyer determine the real, payable cost of the tool for their team before talking to anyone?
0 — No public pricing at all — every number sits behind "contact sales".
3 — Some tiers are public, but a deciding factor (seat minimums, mandatory add-ons, billing-period surcharge, tax treatment) only surfaces at checkout or in fine print.
5 — Self-serve tiers are publicly priced and the billing-period difference is stated, but the headline number still needs qualifying — e.g. annual-only headline, taxes excluded without saying so, or an opaque enterprise tier doing real work.
8 — Every self-serve tier is fully priced with billing periods and tax treatment plain on the page; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Every tier including enterprise has a public price or published price formula, and the headline number is the number on the invoice.
The Data Protection Officer
Two self-serve tiers are publicly priced at €9.50 /month and €23 /month per user, billed yearly (€95/month and €230/month for 10 users), with the Ultimate tier at "Let's talk" and a stated saving of up to 17% for yearly billing. The headline numbers are annual-only, and we found no public information on tax treatment or monthly-period prices, so a buyer still has to qualify the number before signing. 2 9
The Bootstrapper
Essential at "€9.50 /month" and Professional at "€23 /month" per user are published with a worked 10-user total and a free 14-day trial — but both figures are billed yearly, the month-to-month alternative appears only as "save up to 17%", and the top tier reads "Ultimate Let's talk". We found no public information on tax treatment or seat minimums. As a buyer with a card, that is an annual-only headline and a contact-sales ceiling: usable, but the month-to-month number and the top tier both need a conversation. 2 9
The Enterprise Architect
Two self-serve tiers carry public per-user numbers — €9.50 and €23 per user per month, both stated as billed yearly with 10-user totals shown on the page — but the headline is annual-only: 'save up to 17%' implies a higher non-annual figure, and I found no public information on a monthly-billing price or on tax treatment. The Ultimate tier is 'Let's talk' custom pricing doing real enterprise work. That is a headline a buyer must qualify before it becomes an invoice number. 2
The UX Purist
Essential at €9.50/month and Professional at €23/month per user are plainly priced, with 10-user totals of €95/month and €230/month shown on the page — but the only figures captured are billed yearly, the monthly option is gestured at solely through 'save up to 17%', the Ultimate tier is 'Let's talk', and I found no public information on tax treatment. A buyer can budget the self-serve tiers but not the whole invoice. 2 9
The Integrator
Two self-serve tiers are publicly priced — Essential at €9.50 /month (€95/month for 10 users) and Professional at €23 (€230/month for 10 users), both billed yearly — while the billing-period difference appears only as "save up to 17%" with no monthly prices, tax treatment or seat minimums shown. Ultimate is "Let's talk", an opaque top tier in a suite where enterprise features plausibly live, so the headline number still needs qualifying before a buyer can commit. 2
The Skeptic
Both self-serve tiers carry public figures — €9.50 /month and €23 /month per user, each billed yearly, with up-to-17% yearly savings stated and a free 14-day trial — but only yearly-billed prices are shown, tax treatment is not addressed, and the Ultimate tier sits behind "Let's talk". The headline numbers are real yet still need qualifying before a buyer can predict the invoice. 2 9
European sovereignty — proven facts
1 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified | 0/2 pts | 4 Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 11 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. Amazon AWS is a US-headquartered provider even though the servers are stated to be EU-hosted; the pages also name Stripe (credit card processing) and the Notetaker sub-processor 'Recall (Hyperdoc Inc.)' (stated to run on EU-based infrastructure), which are US-incorporated as well.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 18 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 9 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- The panel’s written verdict is withheld: our own re-read found claims in it that the evidence does not carry, and a second synthesis did not fix them. The scores and the material below are unaffected. Know more? Tell us
Sources (14)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage productive.io Checked 17 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Vendor pricing page productive.io Checked 17 Sep 2026 +1 earlier capture: 11 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy productive.io Checked 17 Sep 2026 Details →
- 4 Security page productive.io Checked 17 Sep 2026 Details →
- 5 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap help.productive.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap help.productive.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Reporting — found from sitemap help.productive.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Reporting — found from sitemap help.productive.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Integrations — found from sitemap productive.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Integrations — found from sitemap help.productive.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap help.productive.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap help.productive.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Support & documentation — found from sitemap productive.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Support & documentation — found from sitemap help.productive.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →