whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

ERP

ERPNext

Rest of world Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Frappe Technologies Pvt. Ltd. · frappe.io

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

ERPNext: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai ERPNext: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

ERPNext at a glance

Vendor
Frappe Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 28 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 28 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 28 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates ERPNext 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. ERPNext is the free and open-source ERP from Frappe Technologies Pvt. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 26 Oct 2026 to 28 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 29 Oct 2026. all sources

ERPNext alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The IT Integrator

Weighted verdict

Looks after IT for a mid-sized manufacturer and has to connect the ERP to the shop, the bank, payroll, the BI tool and a supplier's EDI. Wants a public, versioned API with webhooks and a sandbox, roles and an audit log, hosting and subprocessors named, and a full export the day the company leaves.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The IT Integrator

Panel median The IT Integrator This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The IT Integrator
Finance, tax & compliance 3 of 5 3 of 5
Purchasing, inventory & order processing 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Manufacturing, services & projects 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Integration, API & data portability 3.5 of 5 3 of 5
Rollout, roles & operations 3 of 5 3 of 5
European sovereignty 2 of 5 2 of 5
Pricing transparency 3 of 5 2.5 of 5

Finance, tax & compliance

How this is scored

Whether the ERP keeps books a tax adviser and an auditor accept: general and subledgers, VAT per country, GoBD-compliant posting and archiving, e-invoices sent and received (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD), payments and dunning, and a DATEV export or a documented hand-over to the accountant.

0 — No accounting at all; invoices leave as PDFs and the books are kept somewhere else by hand.

3 — Invoices and credit notes are created in the system, but there is no ledger, no stated GoBD compliance and no export the accountant can import.

5 — Invoices, open items and payments in the system with a DATEV or accounting export, VAT rates per item, dunning, and e-invoices in XRechnung or ZUGFeRD format sent to customers.

8 — Full financial accounting or a live-synchronised one: general, receivables and payables ledgers, incoming e-invoices read and matched to purchase orders, bank feeds with payment matching, OSS and reverse-charge VAT, GoBD compliance stated with a procedure documentation, and several companies in one tenant.

10 — The money side closes inside the system: an auditor's GoBD or IDW PS 880 attestation published, consolidation and intercompany postings across entities, fixed assets and cost accounting, every posting traceable to the order, goods movement and user behind it, and period close with locked periods documented.

Report an error

The IT Integrator

Purchase invoices are documented posting properly — crediting the supplier payable, posting taxes, creating payment ledger entries — with perpetual inventory keeping stock value in sync with the general ledger, and a marketplace app exports DATEV CSV and sends vouchers to DATEV Unternehmen Online. The e-invoicing captured is India's GST system, and we found no public information on GoBD compliance, XRechnung or ZUGFeRD, dunning or bank feeds; the DATEV app itself is noted as not approved or endorsed by DATEV eG. 7 8 5 6 1

Report an error

Purchasing, inventory & order processing

How this is scored

The goods chain from supplier to customer: quotes, orders and order confirmations, purchasing and goods receipt, stock per warehouse and bin, batch and serial numbers, picking and shipping, returns — and whether each step posts through to the next document and to the ledger instead of being retyped.

0 — No order or stock handling; the product is a contact list or an invoicing tool.

3 — Items with a stock count and an order list, but purchasing, goods receipt and delivery are not connected and stock is corrected by hand.

5 — Quote, order, delivery note and invoice as one document chain, purchase orders with goods receipt booking stock, and stock levels with reorder points per item.

8 — Several warehouses and storage bins, batch and serial number tracking, mobile picking and scanning, carrier and shop or marketplace connections, returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping, and stock valuation that flows into the books.

10 — The goods chain runs and is evidenced in the system: demand-driven purchasing proposals, EDI with suppliers and customers, fulfilment and multi-channel stock allocation, best-before and recall traceability per batch from supplier to customer, and every movement attributed and dated.

Report an error

The IT Integrator

The supplier chain is documented end to end: purchase orders are received into separate accepted and rejected warehouses posting stock ledger entries, receipts flow into invoices that create the payable, with batch and serial tracking, barcode scanning, returns, subcontracting and stock valuation posting into the books. The customer side is thinner in the captured pages — sales invoicing appears mainly in the e-invoice documentation — and we found no public information on reorder points, bin storage, carrier or shop connections, or picking and shipping. 8 8 7 1

Report an error

Manufacturing, services & projects

How this is scored

The depth for the buyer's own business model: bills of materials, work orders and capacity planning for manufacturers; projects, time, resources and milestone billing for service firms; contracts, subscriptions and field service. A product is judged on the models it says it serves.

0 — Nothing beyond trading goods; no bills of materials, projects or service billing.

3 — A simple kit or set of items, or a project tag on invoices, but no production orders, no time recording and no planning.

5 — For at least one model a working core: bills of materials with production orders consuming stock, or projects with time recording and billing from logged hours, with the supported models named on the vendor's pages.

8 — Multi-level bills of materials with routings, work centres and capacity planning, or projects with budgets, resource planning, milestone and recurring billing, and service or maintenance contracts — with costs flowing to cost accounting.

10 — Industry depth documented for the models served: MRP runs with material and capacity planning, shop-floor data capture and quality checks, variant configuration, or full professional-services automation with utilisation, contracts and revenue recognition — each described with its limits in public documentation.

Report an error

The IT Integrator

As a manufacturer I see real depth: multi-level bills of materials with routings and workstations used for costing and scheduling, phantom and template BOMs for variants, scrap and by-products, semi-finished goods produced at each operation, and quality inspection that blocks submission when required. We found no public information on MRP runs, capacity planning or shop-floor data capture beyond named Job Cards, and projects appear only as a module name and a costing link on the bill of materials. 9 9 1

Report an error

Integration, API & data portability

How this is scored

How the ERP connects and how the data gets in and out: a public API reference, webhooks, standard connectors for shops, marketplaces, banks, payroll, DATEV and BI, data import from the previous system, and a documented full export when the company leaves.

0 — No API, no import and no export beyond printing.

3 — CSV import and export of some lists, a few named integrations, but no public API documentation and no full export.

5 — A documented REST or OData API, CSV or Excel import for master data and open items, and standard connectors to common shops, banks and DATEV.

8 — A public, versioned API reference covering all main objects with webhooks, a connector marketplace, a documented migration path from named predecessor systems, and a full data export of master data, documents and postings available to the customer.

10 — Open by design and evidenced: complete API coverage with sandbox tenants and rate limits stated, open data formats or open-source code, a contractual exit with export format and timeline, and self-hosting or on-premise as a documented alternative to the vendor's cloud.

Report an error

The IT Integrator

Data egress is the strong suit: the software is GPL-3.0 and self-hostable on our own servers, the terms promise ERPNext site exports in a format importable into other ERPNext instances, and a marketplace carries connectors such as the DATEV app. The homepage claims an API-first RESTful design, but we found no public API reference, webhooks, sandbox tenants or a documented migration path from a predecessor system in the captured pages. 2 4 1 3

Report an error

Rollout, roles & operations

How this is scored

What it takes to go live and run the system: implementation path (self-service, vendor, partner network), onboarding and training, roles and permissions, audit log, updates and customisation that survive them, support channels and service levels, and availability.

0 — No information on implementation, roles, support or availability.

3 — A contact form and a help page, but no stated implementation path, no role model and no support terms.

5 — A described onboarding or implementation offer, user roles with permissions, a help centre with current documentation, and support channels with hours.

8 — Implementation methods with typical duration stated, a certified partner network or vendor services listed, fine-grained permissions with a change log, customisation without code that survives updates, and published service levels for support and availability.

10 — Operations are evidenced: a status page with uptime history, release notes and an update policy, a field-level audit trail, sandbox or test tenants, and support, training and implementation terms public enough to plan a go-live without a sales call.

Report an error

The IT Integrator

Go-live is well served with self-implementation documentation, Starter Packs delivered by certified partners, a network of 200+ partners, granular roles and permissions with approval workflows, and a support portal governed by a published SLA for response and resolution times. We found no public information on an audit log, typical implementation durations or stated support hours, and the terms state Frappe does not guarantee uninterrupted access, with the entry server plan sold with limited uptime guarantees. 2 3 1 3

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where the ERP data — customers, suppliers, prices, postings, employees — is hosted, and who the subprocessors are (cloud infrastructure, email, support tooling, AI features). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; an ERP holds a company's entire commercial record, so the ownership chain counts, not only the server location.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the service are not named.

5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (US hyperscaler, AI features, support or email tooling) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered, and an on-premise or EU-only hosting option stated.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5 published rather than implied.

Report an error

The IT Integrator

The contracting entity is Frappe Technologies Pvt. Ltd. under Indian law with Mumbai courts, data may be stored in locations across the world, and offsite backups are held in India — far from the European-sovereignty ideal for a system holding our entire commercial record. Partial mitigations are public: a GDPR data processing addendum available on request, an EU/UK representative, a processor list URL, ISO 27001 described in the terms, and GPL-3.0 self-hosting that lets me keep the data on our own EU infrastructure. 4 3 4 2 3

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a company can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user, module, company or transaction volume, which modules (accounting, warehouse, production, POS) cost extra, implementation and onboarding fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call or a partner proposal.

3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with users, modules or companies is unclear.

5 — Prices per edition or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (implementation, extra companies, warehouse or production module, API use) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every edition and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per user, company or volume), onboarding and implementation packages priced, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given company size and module set, with every add-on, implementation, support and hosting cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The IT Integrator

The base model is unusually legible: no fee for the open-source software, no per-user pricing, hosting listed at $5 onwards /mo for a single site, $20 onwards /mo for servers and $125 onwards /mo for dedicated, payments stated exclusive of taxes, and cancellation by discontinuing payment at the end of the billing period. The real annual cost is still not computable, because these are onward prices with resource limits set at Frappe's discretion, pricing may be modified at its sole discretion, and Starter Packs, Enterprise plans and marketplace apps are unpriced in the captured pages. 2 3 1 3

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about ERPNext

Is ERPNext European?

No. whats-best.ai classifies ERPNext as Rest of world.

Where does ERPNext store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 28 Oct 2026.

Does ERPNext have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 28 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to ERPNext?

As of 29 Oct 2026, the panel rates Odoo (4/5), weclapp (3.5/5) and Haufe X360 (3.5/5) highest among the other 13 ERP products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Odoo (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: ERPNext alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about ERPNext? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (9)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage frappe.io Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Pricing page frappe.io Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Terms naming the legal entity docs.frappe.io Checked 28 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Privacy policy docs.frappe.io Checked 28 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap docs.frappe.io Checked 28 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap docs.frappe.io Checked 28 Oct 2026 +2 earlier captures: 26 Oct 2026, 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap docs.frappe.io Checked 28 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap docs.frappe.io Checked 28 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap docs.frappe.io Checked 28 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 26 Oct 2026 Details →