Crawling & technical audit
How this is scored
Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.
0 — No site crawler; the product is keyword data only.
3 — A crawler with a low page cap that reports broken links and missing tags, with no prioritisation and no rendering of JavaScript.
5 — Scheduled crawls at a stated page limit, JavaScript rendering, issue categories with severity, and Core Web Vitals pulled per template.
8 — Log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.
10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.
The Agency Owner
This is the core product and it shows: Cloud crawls to 10m URLs with JavaScript rendering via headless Chrome, 300+ hints described as automatically checked and prioritised, and genuinely diagnostic indexation work — non-self-referential canonicals, the specific robots.txt rule behind every affected URL, and eleven indexing directives reported. Structured Data and Performance reports are Pro-licensed and audit comparisons exist between crawls; I found no public information on log-file analysis or crawl budget analysis, which is what keeps it short of the top. 1 2 3 4 7 8