whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

SEO

Sitebulb

UK / wider Europe Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Sitebulb Ltd · sitebulb.com

Compare with Screaming Frog SEO Spider → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Skeptic

Weighted verdict

Knows every vendor claims the largest index and the most accurate rankings, and that no buyer can check either. Reads instead for what can be held to: refresh frequency, stated limits, credit costs per endpoint, and what the invoice does when the team adds a seat.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Skeptic

Crawling & technical audit

How this is scored

Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.

0 — No site crawler; the product is keyword data only.

3 — A crawler with a low page cap that reports broken links and missing tags, with no prioritisation and no rendering of JavaScript.

5 — Scheduled crawls at a stated page limit, JavaScript rendering, issue categories with severity, and Core Web Vitals pulled per template.

8 — Log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.

10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Every limit I look for is stated and checkable: 10,000 URLs on Lite, 500,000 default with a documented raise to 2 million, 10 million on Cloud, a 10-second TTFB default, configurable render timeout and threads — with JavaScript rendering via headless Chrome and daily, weekly or monthly scheduling. Canonical and robots diagnosis goes deep — non-self-referential canonicals, canonicals pointing at noindexed URLs, conflicting robots declarations across head, header and robots.txt — alongside structured-data validation on Pro and audit comparisons to catch regressions between crawls. We found no public information on log-file analysis, crawl-budget analysis, or the basis on which the 300+ prioritised hints are ranked. 1 2 3 4 7 8

Report an error

Keyword research & content guidance

How this is scored

Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.

0 — A keyword list with volumes from one source and no intent or difficulty signal.

3 — Volume and difficulty for major markets, with thin or stale German data and no SERP feature detail.

5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and intent across German and other EU markets, SERP feature presence, and basic on-page recommendations.

8 — Topic clustering, competitor gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs with entity coverage, and cannibalisation detection.

10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Every keyword figure in this product is the customer's own Search Console data re-cut inside an audit — brand versus non-brand, device splits, template breakdowns — and we found no public information on keyword volumes, difficulty, intent classification, SERP feature analysis, or any German-language keyword database of the vendor's own. Content guidance amounts to duplicate content detection and a spell checker. This is reporting on data you already own, not research. 2 5 6

Report an error

Rank tracking & index quality

How this is scored

The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.

0 — Rankings and backlinks with no stated update frequency, no country or device granularity, and no documentation of how either is collected.

3 — Weekly rankings for one country and device, a backlink index with no stated refresh cadence or size.

5 — Daily rankings with country, language and device selection, local results, and a backlink index with a documented crawl frequency.

8 — Rankings at stated frequency across many locations including city-level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh published, lost-and-found link detection, and historical data retained for the life of the account.

10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.

Report an error

The Skeptic

We found no public information on a proprietary ranking index or any backlink index; the vendor's own export guide describes blending audit data with other sources for 'keyword, rankings or backlink data', which tells you where those live. Rankings shown are Search Console performance with desktop, mobile and tablet and brand segmentation, and the collection method — a Search Console connection with keyword analysis enabled — is documented. The pages make no proprietary-data claims to hold the vendor to: no index size, no freshness cadence, no methodology. 5 6 10

Report an error

Reporting, integrations & API

How this is scored

Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.

0 — On-screen views only; export is a manual CSV and there is no API.

3 — Scheduled PDF reports and CSV export, one analytics integration, no API worth building against.

5 — Customisable dashboards, scheduled reports, Search Console and analytics integration, and a documented API with stated limits.

8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with credit costs published per endpoint.

10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The out-of-the-box reporting is real: a live Data Studio connector with per-crawl dashboard updates, automated Google Sheets pushes that append a row per audit, a 271-column historical export, portfolio dashboards clients can view without a Sitebulb login, and S3 export on certain Cloud plans. But we found no public information on a REST API, its rate limits, or per-endpoint costs — the only programmatic surface documented is an MCP hook for Claude and ChatGPT — and the S3 export itself is a sales contact rather than a published price. 1 2 9 10 12

Report an error

Data portability & exit

How this is scored

Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.

0 — No bulk export; history is visible in the interface and nowhere else, and ends with the subscription.

3 — CSV export of current views only, with historical data capped or unavailable in bulk.

5 — Bulk export of rankings, keywords and crawl results including history, via interface or API.

8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.

10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Exports are bulk and unmetered: CSV and multi-sheet XLSX across 271 columns described as every metric, historical audit data exportable, automated delivery to a local folder or cloud drive, project transfer between machines, and a share file that gives any other user the entire audit. The catches are scale and price: standard exports stop at 1 million rows, and the S3 route past that is limited to certain Cloud plans via a sales contact. We found no public information on retention after cancellation, and nothing in the captured pages describes a way to mirror the archive continuously. 10 12 11

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and site or user data of unclear scope leaving the EU.

3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain are non-EU without an explained safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessor list published, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The contracting entity is plainly published — Sitebulb Limited of Biddenden, Kent, company number 12125600 — but that jurisdiction is the UK, outside the EU, and we found no public information on hosting location, ownership, or any named subprocessor despite the tool ingesting Google Analytics and Search Console data. Every question a sovereignty review would ask is answered with silence. 2 3

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — A monthly headline exists, but keyword limits, crawl credits or the cost of an additional user are unstated — the invoice is unknowable.

5 — Tier prices public with the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (extra seats, API credits, historical data) is unpriced or metered opaquely.

8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The holdable parts: Lite at $18/month with 10,000 URLs per audit, additional users at $11 per month, the Pro URL limit of 500,000 raiseable to 2 million, a 15% yearly discount, and payment terms including purchase order for yearly plans. The parts that make the invoice unknowable: we found no public information on the Pro tier's own price, and Cloud is quoted only as 'plans starting from £95/month' rising 'in excess of £20k/year' — a spread, not a computable bill — while the S3 export add-on is a sales conversation and VAT treatment goes unstated. 1 2 12

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Sources (12)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 2 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Pricing sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +2 earlier captures: 11 Sep 2026, 2 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap support.sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap support.sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap support.sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap support.sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap support.sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap support.sitebulb.com Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →