whats-best.ai

Event Registration & Ticketing · head-to-head

pretix vs Ticket Tailor

As of 30 Oct 2026, the panel rates pretix 3/5 and Ticket Tailor 3/5 in Event Registration & Ticketing. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 4 of the 6 judges pick pretix and 2 pick Ticket Tailor. pretix scores higher on 3 of 6 criteria (VAT, invoices & accounting handoff, Ticket shop, checkout & registration and Check-in, badges & on-site sales). Ticket Tailor scores higher on 2 of 6 criteria (European sovereignty and Attendee data & the customer relationship). Provenance — pretix: EU-Made; Ticket Tailor: UK / wider Europe. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.

pretix

EU-Made

Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Full evaluation →

Ticket Tailor

UK / wider Europe

Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Full evaluation →

The short answer

pretix leads where the benches agree: check-in and onsite (8.0 vs 6.8, six judges lean pretix), invoicing and tax (6.8 vs 2.8, six judges lean pretix) and shop and registration (7.5 vs 6.3, five judges lean pretix, one tie). Ticket Tailor takes attendee data ownership (7.5 vs 6.0), sovereignty (6.3 vs 4.2) and pricing transparency (4.0 vs 3.0), with six judges leaning Ticket Tailor in each. Payments and fees is the genuine split: both mean 6.3, with two judges leaning pretix, two Ticket Tailor and two ties. Weighted totals divide too: pretix is ahead for the conference organiser (6.8 vs 5.9), venue promoter (7.1 vs 6.1), course provider (6.3 vs 5.7) and revenue accountant (6.4 vs 4.8); Ticket Tailor for the data protection officer (6.8 vs 5.8) and skeptic (6.3 vs 6.0). Both list data residency as EU only; jurisdictions are DE and GB, ownership unknown for both.

Choose pretix if

  • You need the platform to carry invoicing and tax — six judges lean pretix (6.8 vs 2.8), while Ticket Tailor's terms make the organiser solely responsible for determining, collecting and remitting VAT and other taxes.
  • Your events depend on onsite check-in — pretix scores 8.0 vs 6.8 with six judges leaning pretix, on multi-device realtime scanning with duplicate prevention and an offline mode with a local copy of attendee data.
  • Your shop and registration requirements decide the purchase — five judges lean pretix (7.5 vs 6.3) with one tie.
  • You are buying as a venue promoter or revenue accountant — their weighted totals put pretix ahead at 7.1 vs 6.1 and 6.4 vs 4.8.
  • You need a German contracting entity — pretix's legal jurisdiction attribute is DE.

Choose Ticket Tailor if

  • You must document attendee-data handling — Ticket Tailor scores 7.5 vs 6.0 with six judges leaning its way, on stated controller and processor roles, deletion on request with published timelines, and export by spreadsheet, MailChimp sync and API.
  • A data protection officer signs off the purchase — that judge's weighted total is 6.8 for Ticket Tailor vs 5.8 for pretix.
  • Pricing transparency drives your shortlist — six judges lean Ticket Tailor (4.0 vs 3.0).
  • You need documented European hosting — Ticket Tailor scores 6.3 vs 4.2 on sovereignty with six judges leaning its way, and the verdict cites AWS Europe infrastructure in Dublin.
  • You prefer an English-law contracting entity — Ticket Tailor's legal jurisdiction attribute is GB and the verdict notes a contracting entity under English law.

Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Skeptic

Has seen "free for free events" turn into a fee on every paid ticket that buyers blame the organiser for, payouts held until a week after the show, and a platform that emails the organiser's audience about a rival's concert. Reads "your data belongs to you" next to buyer accounts on the platform's own app, and an export that stops at names and emails — and asks what leaving would cost.

pretix

Ticket Tailor

This judge's pick

Criterion by criterion

Ticket shop, checkout & registration

pretix

A white-label shop under the organiser's own domain with a free SSL certificate, a graphical seating-plan editor with seat selection, add-on bundles, a waiting list, unlimited custom questions in several types, and three shop languages, with shop accessibility claimed under EN 301 549. We found no public information on group and company bookings with several attendees per order, conditional questions, or recurring dates and course series, so it sits just below the top documented tier.

Ticket Tailor

Seating is documented in real depth — trace a venue plan, add tables, booths and bars, assign several ticket types per seat, prevent orphan seats — alongside ticket groups, scheduled on-sales, merch upsells, membership tickets and selling on the organiser's own website in a checkout translated into 14 languages. What stopped me going higher: we found no public information on discount codes, custom questions per attendee, waiting lists or group bookings with several attendees per order, and the white-label upgrade is mentioned in the terms as a paid upgrade with neither price nor domain-level detail shown.

Payments, payouts, fees & refunds

pretix

Attendees pay the ticket price directly to the organiser, via the organiser's own bank or own provider from a long named list including Stripe, PayPal, Mollie and Adyen, and the legal notice states pretix GmbH is not the seller of the tickets — the platform never holds the organiser's revenue. We found no public information on the fee per ticket, refunds of single orders or a cancelled event, ticket transfer or resale, or chargeback handling, which keeps it below the higher tier.

Ticket Tailor

The money model is the one I look for: the organiser connects their own Stripe, Square or PayPal account and links their bank for payouts, the platform states ticket revenue goes directly from buyer to that account and that it never touches the money, fees can be passed to buyers, and cash, cheque and invoice are accepted offline. But we found no public information on refunds of single orders or of a cancelled event, chargeback handling, or ticket transfer and resale, and the captured pages state no payout-schedule conditions; the fee itself is described only as a flat fee per ticket sold without an amount.

VAT, invoices & accounting handoff

pretix

Automatic invoice generation with configurable contents, ZUGFeRD and Peppol e-invoices, a DATEV Rechnungsdatenservice export, and reverse-charge invoices per § 13b UStG for cross-border EU sales, with demo prices shown as "EUR 250,00 inkl. 19% MwSt." and the platform stating it is not the seller of the tickets. We found no public information on credit notes on refund, VAT-ID validation, net prices for business buyers, or several VAT rates within one order.

Ticket Tailor

The terms put it plainly: the organiser is solely responsible for determining, collecting and remitting any taxes, including VAT. The only invoice-related item on the captured pages is invoice as an offline payment method, and we found no public information on VAT rates per ticket, invoices in the organiser's name with consecutive numbers, reverse charge, credit notes, or exports to a named accounting system — tickets are delivered by email, which is confirmation-level at best.

Check-in, badges & on-site sales

pretix

Multi-device realtime scanning with duplicate prevention, an offline mode holding a local copy of attendee data that syncs when connectivity returns, badges printed live in the organiser's design, check-in lists restricted per product, an Android box-office app synchronising quotas with central accounting, card terminals via a ZVT interface, attendance certificates at one click, and hardware offered alongside the software. We found no public information on walk-in registration or self-service kiosks, so it reaches the strong documented tier but not the top.

Ticket Tailor

A free iOS and Android app that scans in milliseconds, works offline, runs on multiple user profiles, supports external scanners, spots tickets bought together, tracks check-ins by staff member, hides sensitive data and removes access after the event — plus on-door sales with Tap to Pay via Stripe needing no extra hardware, cash payment recording and manual check-in of attendees without tickets. What holds it back: we found no public information on badge printing, access rules per entrance, session or day, or attendance certificates.

Attendee data & the customer relationship

pretix

The roles are stated plainly — the organiser acts as data controller and pretix as processor under Art. 28 GDPR, with a data processing agreement to sign inside the account, white-label hosting under the organiser's brand, a REST API, and a customer-account function that builds the organiser's own customer base. We found no public information on whether the platform markets other events to the organiser's buyers, newsletter consent in the checkout, attendee messaging, or deletion and anonymisation after the event, so the cost of leaving is unproven.

Ticket Tailor

This is the part I poke hardest at, and it holds: the organiser is named controller and the platform processor, the pages state it won't send attendees any marketing emails or share their data, deletion on request is offered ("It's your data. 100%."), export before account closure is required by the terms, an opt-in checkbox in the checkout syncs only consenting contacts to MailChimp, and reply-to defaults to the organiser's own email. Short of the top: we found no public information on whether buyers must create a platform account or on a marketplace listing, retention is not shown as configurable per event, and the documented export is a spreadsheet list plus API and MailChimp synchronisation — a complete importable handover is not described.

European sovereignty

pretix

The imprint proves a German contracting entity (pretix GmbH, Heidelberg, registered at Amtsgericht Mannheim under HRB 738451), and the homepage claims ISO 27001 certification and GDPR conformity, with a published GDPR page covering processor duties and Art. 32 security. We found no public information on where attendee, order and payment data are hosted or on any subprocessor in the chain — a green-electricity hosting claim names no location — so the evidence rises only slightly above the basic documented tier.

Ticket Tailor

Hosting is named and European — AWS Europe in Dublin, eu-west-1, encrypted at rest and in transit — with a published sub-processor list giving locations and safeguards: email via SparkPost only inside the EU, Stripe and Square on EU infrastructure with US transfers under stated safeguards, though PayPal sits on US infrastructure as a controller and Cloudflare operates worldwide. But the contracting entity is Zimma Ltd in England and Wales under English law with the UK ICO as supervisory authority, analytics run through Google and Amplitude, and we found no public information on ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications.

Pricing transparency

pretix

The only pricing statement on the captured pages is that test events carry no fees, and a prices page is listed among the vendor's documents. We found no public information on the fee for a paid ticket, payment processing fees, who pays them, subscriptions or credit packs, or payout and refund fees — no organiser could compute the real cost of an event from these pages.

Ticket Tailor

"If your event is free, so are we" — I have seen that movie, and here the paid side is documented as a model: a simple flat fee for every ticket sold, no contracts, setup fees or monthly charges, pass-on to buyers optional with the exact amount settable, prepaid credits with five free at signup, a 50% charity discount, a 30-day money-back guarantee, and fees the terms declare non-refundable even if the event is cancelled. But the captured pages give the model without the amount: we found no public information on the per-ticket fee figure, payment processing fee amounts, the white-label upgrade's price, refund fees, or the VAT treatment of the fees.

Sovereignty, side by side

Dimension pretix Ticket Tailor
Legal entity Not determined Not determined
Hosting location Not determined Not determined
Hosting options Not determined Not determined
Open source Not determined Not determined
Data processing agreement Not determined Not determined
Transfer impact assessment Not determined Not determined

Facts, side by side

Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.

Compliance · Controller processor roles Art. 28 GDPR · pretix · customer1

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

controller · processor2

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Compliance · GDPR yes3

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

GDPR compliance info available4

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Legal · Entity Heidelberg · pretix GmbH · Berthold-Mogel-Straße 1 · Deutschland · 691265

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Zimma Ltd trading as Ticket Tailor6

captured 29 Oct 2026 · Report an error

Questions about pretix and Ticket Tailor

Which is better, pretix or Ticket Tailor?

As of 30 Oct 2026, the panel rates both 3/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 4 of the 6 judges pick pretix and 2 pick Ticket Tailor. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.

Is pretix or Ticket Tailor European?

pretix is European (EU-Made). Ticket Tailor is European (UK / wider Europe). Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.

Where do pretix and Ticket Tailor store customer data?

Per the vendors’ own pages as captured — pretix: its pages as captured do not say. Ticket Tailor: Default not stated; pages mention Ireland and the EU.