Ticketing, queues & SLA
How this is scored
The engine: how work is routed, prioritised, escalated and measured — and whether an agent can find the ticket they need among ten thousand.
0 — A shared mailbox with labels; no ownership, no status model, no history beyond the thread.
3 — Tickets with assignment and open/closed status, but routing is manual, there are no SLA timers and search covers subject lines only.
5 — Queues with rules-based routing, priorities, a working status model, SLA timers with breach warnings, and full-text search across ticket bodies.
8 — Business-hours-aware SLA policies per queue or customer, escalation chains, macros and triggers, merge and split, and reporting on first-response and resolution time by agent and queue.
10 — The workload is managed rather than merely tracked: capacity-aware assignment, SLA per contract with reporting an account manager could show a customer, audit of every status change, and search that finds the ticket from a half-remembered phrase.
The Integrator
The SLA engine is real and granular: five timer types across first answer, next answer, first resolve, and call and chat pickup, business hours and holidays that extend rather than pause the timers, an SLA log feeding compliance reports, and SLA levels driving the ordering of the ticket grid and the To-solve distribution to agents. Canned messages, tags, rules and time rules, ticket split, and departments with per-department roles give me a workable routing base. I found no public information on merging tickets, escalation chains on breach, or search behaviour across ticket bodies, which keeps it below the top band. 4 5 11 13